§ 2.41 p.m.
§ LORD GLADWYNMy Lords, I beg leave to ask the Question which stands in my name on the Order Paper.
§ The Question was as follows:
§ To ask Her Majesty's Government whether the review of industrial training promised in the Earl of Gowrie's Statement of July, 1973, has now been conducted; when a Report based on it is likely to be published; and what provision for overseas students it contains.
§ LORD JACQUESMy Lords, the review to which the noble Earl, Lord Gowrie, referred has not yet been completed but my right honourable friend is considering this matter and hopes to be able to come to conclusions at an early date.
§ LORD GLADWYNMy Lords, while thanking the noble Lord for that not very satisfactory reply, may I point out that this——
§ SEVERAL NOBLE LORDS: No!
§ LORD GLADWYNMy Lords, may I ask whether the noble Lord agrees that this matter has now been under review for nearly 18 months, which is rather a long time? Will the Government agree that it might be better not to refer this matter to, as I understand, a rather low 1396 level committee or Working Party coming under one Ministry, but to an interdepartmental committee representing all the interests of the students concerned, with a view to getting an urgent recommendation about the technical training of, at any rate, some overseas students during the coming year?
§ LORD JACQUESMy Lords, the Working Party concerned is fairly widely representative. It comprises representatives of the Ministry of Overseas Development, the British Council, the Council for Technical Education and Training for Overseas Countries, the Department of Trade, the Department of Employment, the training service agencies and the CBI.
§ LORD GLADWYNThen, my Lords, why have they not managed with all that talent to produce some kind of recommendation before now?
§ LORD JACQUESMy Lords, it is not unknown that when there is too much talent there is too much delay.
§ LORD BLYTONMy Lords, is it not a fact that when you have so many experts you never get a decision?
§ LORD SAINSBURYMy Lords, can my noble friend enlighten me? I was not clear from his statement whether this Working Party has as yet met at all, or is not meeting till January 1 next year.
§ LORD JACQUESMy Lords, the Working Party has met. On more than one occasion it indicated the material that was required for study, and it took a considerable time to get the mass of information collected.
§ LORD BYERSMy Lords, when was the last occasion on which the Working Party actually met and what did the noble Lord mean by reporting "at an early date"? Is this before Christmas?
§ LORD JACQUESMy Lords. I think we should be quite clear that this Administration has been in Office since March, so its responsibility commences from March.
§ LORD CARRINGTONIt seems much longer!
§ LORD JACQUESI am not surprised! My Lords, the Committee since then has met two or three times; I cannot give 1397 the precise number. We have not wasted a great deal of time. In the context of the statement that I have made, I would say that "early" would mean months rather than years.
§ LORD GLADWYNMy Lords, is the noble Lord aware that the Government are not taking this matter seriously? I would now urge them to do so.
§ LORD JACQUESMy Lords, we take the original Question seriously, but I think the noble Lord will admit that some of the supplementaries were a little less serious.
§ SEVERAL NOBLE LORDS: No!