HL Deb 27 January 1966 vol 272 c258

7.36 p.m.

LORD ILFORD

My Lords, I do not propose to move the Motion which stands in my name on the Order Paper as follows:

"That the Northampton and County Police (Amalgamation) Order 1965, laid before the House in draft on the 17th of November last, be not made".

It would not be right to assume from that that the Northampton Borough Council are more reconciled to the loss of their police force; they very much resent it. But I have had to make the best estimate I can of the feelings in your Lordships' House. I have come to the conclusion that I should not be justified in troubling your Lordships with this Motion. I must express my regret to the House for the late stage at which I reached this conclusion, but I hope that your Lordships, with your customary generosity towards such lapses, will recognise the difficulties of arriving at this decision at a time when the House has only just resumed its Sittings and in relation to a Motion the timing of which, to be effective, is strictly prescribed.

I think I ought to express my regret to any noble Lord who has come here looking forward to taking part in an interesting debate and who has been disappointed. All I can say, if there should be such a Member present, is that he might not have found the debate upon this subject as entertaining as he anticipated.

THE JOINT PARLIAMENTARY UNDER-SECRETARY OF STATE, HOME OFFICE (LORD STONHAM)

My Lords, I should like to thank the noble Lord, Lord Ilford, for his courtesy in explaining why he did not move his Motion. It is a matter of regret to me, of course, that I did not hear the speech he was to make, and no doubt to him that he has not heard the one which I would have made. But I hope he will accept my assurance that, so far as we are concerned, we are quite certain there will be no loss or suffering to the police force.