STANDING ORDERS COMMITTEE.

HL Deb 09 April 1926 vol 63 cc523-4

Report from, That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the

• Shoreham Harbour Bill

ought to be dispensed with:

That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the Petition for additional provision in the

• Rhymncy Valley Water Bill

ought to be dispensed with:

That the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the

• Kidderminister and Stourport Tramways Bill [H.L.]

ought to be dispensed with, and the Bill allowed to proceed, on condition that the powers for the construction of Tramways Nos. I and 1A shall be struck out of the Bill in Committee unless at that stage the Promoters shall prove that they have obtained the consents of local and road authorities under Standing Order 22:

And that the Standing Orders not complied with in respect of the Petition for additional provision in the

• London County Council (General Powers) Bill [H.L.]

ought to be dispensed with, and leave given to the Committee on the Bill to insert the additional provision:

Read, and agreed to.

The LORD CHANCELLOR acquainted the House, that the Clerk of the Parliaments had laid upon the Table the Certificate from the Examiners that the Standing Orders applicable to the following Bill have been complied with:

• Scottish Widows' Fund and Life Assurance Society — (Substituted Bill).

And also the Certificate that the further Standing Orders applicable to the following Bill have been complied with:

• Brompton, Chatham, Gillingham and Rochester Water. [H.L.]

The same were ordered to lie on the Table.