Lords Sitting of 16 June 1915

LURGAN URBAN DISTRICT COUNCIL BILL.
Committee to meet on Tuesday next.
KILMARNOCK GAS ORDER CONFIRMATION BILL. [H.L.]
  IRVINE AND DISTRICT WATER BOARD (EMERGENCY POWERS) ORDER CONFIRMATION BILL. [H.L.]
    PORT-GLASGOW GAS AND BURGH EXTENSION ORDER CONFIRMATION BILL. [H.L.]
    To be read 3a on Tuesday next.
FRIENDS' PROVIDENT INSTITUTION BILL.
Reported, with Amendments.

PLYMOUTH CORPORATION BILL. [H.L.]
Moved, That Standing Order No. 143 be dispensed with, and that the Bill be now read 3a.—(The Earl of Donoughmore.)
On Question, Motion agreed to, and Bill read 3a accordingly.
THE CHAIRMAN OF COMMITTEES (THE EARL OF DONOUGHMORE): My Lords, before I move that this Bill do pass, there is one small point that I think I ought to explain to your Lordships. This Bill as introduced contained two clauses which were not in accordance with your Lordships' Model Bill—a clause which dealt with gas fittings, and a clause which dealt with electric fittings; and as soon as the Bill was known of I received letters from several of your Lordships desiring to move the rejection of the Bill on Second Reading. I appealed to those noble Lords to allow the Bill to go to Committee. They were good enough to consent to that course, and the Committee passed both of these clauses. Subsequent to the Committee negotiations, which I initiated, took, place between all the parties, and the result has been a settlement on the following lines. The promoters withdrew the electric fittings clause and substituted the Model Clause as regards electric fittings which is found in your Lordships' Model Bill. The gas fittings clause, however, is not in the model form. The corporation are allowed to trade in gas fittings on the same lines as the old Devonport Corporation—now part of the
60
Plymouth Corporation—were allowed to trade. The reason why I appealed to the noble Lords who are opposed to the clause to withdraw their opposition was this, that under the faith of a Parliamentary title—namely, under a clause in the Devon-port Corporation Act—the old Devonport Corporation had spent some £70,000 in building up their business. I thought it would. be unreasonable, as this expenditure had been made on capital account under a Parliamentary title, that any action of your Lordships should cause the practical waste of that sum now. For that reason, my Lords, I recommended this compromise to both parties, and I desire to acknowledge the courtesy with which they met me and agreed to it.
Moved, That the Bill do pass.—(The Earl of Donoughmore.)
On Question, Bill passed and sent to the Commons.

ELECTRIC LIGHTING PROVISIONAL ORDERS (No. 2) BILL. (No. 93.)
  GAS AND WATER PROVISIONAL ORDERS (No. 1) BILL. (No. 94.)
  Brought from the Commons; read la; to be printed; and referred to the Examiners.
STREATLEY AND GORING BRIDGE BILL.
Returned from the Commons, with the Amendments, agreed to.

RETURNS, REPORTS, ETC.
National Galleries of Scotland Act, 1906—Eighth Report to the Secretary for Scotland by the Board of Trustees for the National Galleries of Scotland, for the year from 1st April 1914 to 31st March 1915:
Presented (by command) and ordered to lie on the Table.
Universities (Scotland) Act, 1889—Reports for the year 1913–1914 under the provisions of section 30 of the Act—

1. Annual Report on the state of the finances of the University of St. Andrews;

2. Annual Statistical Report by the University Court of the University of St. Andrews to the Secretary for Scotland:

National Insurance Acts—

1. Regulations entitled—

I. The National Health Insurance (Value of Contributions, Exempted Institution) Regulations, 1915, dated 12th June, 1915;

II. The National Health Insurance (Time for joining an Approved Society) Amendment Regulations, 1915, dated 12th June 1915;

2. Provisional Regulations entitled—

I. The National Health insurance (Transition to Full Rate of Benefit) Amendment Regulations, 1915, dated 12th June 1915;

II. The National Health Insurance (Arrears) Amendment Regulations (No. 2) 1915, dated 14th June 1915:

Laid before the House (pursuant to Act) and ordered to lie on the Table.

ELECTRIC LIGHTING PROVISIONAL ORDERS (No. 1) BILL.
  LOCAL GOVERNMENT PROVISIONAL ORDER (No. 7) BILL.
  Read 2a, (according to Order), and committed for Tuesday next.

GERMAN OUTRAGES—COMMITTEES REPORT.
LORD CHARNWOOD LORD CHARNWOOD rose to ask His Majesty's Government whether they would procure the translation of the Report of Viscount Bryce's Committee on German atrocities into the principal languages of Europe, and of sonic Asiatic countries.
The noble Lord said: My Lords, I should like to be allowed to say a word as to my object in putting this Question, because, of course, nothing could be more futile or distasteful to ourselves while the war is at its height than that we should relieve our feelings in any mere words in regard to the conduct of our enemies. But this war, however long it lasts, cannot be quite the final stage in what is nothing less than a conflict between two civilisations—the peculiar civilisation represented by modern Germany, and that other civilisation of which at any rate the rough idea is common, one might almost say, to all the other nations of the earth; and in that
62
connection the grisly State Paper to which my Question refers is, and may for a long while remain, a very significant document.
I do not suggest that His Majesty's Government should undertake the task of distributing this or ally other literature in foreign countries. I am not sure that the hawking about of literature quite falls within the sphere of effective Government action. But if this Report were available in a number of different languages, I am confident that a demand for it would arise from time to time among people who read and think in a number of parts of this Empire and in a number of foreign nations, some, perhaps, of which we did not at first think. The initial task, however, of procuring translations of this Report into many foreign languages is one which at the present time would, think, be quite beyond the powers of anybody but the Government itself. If the Government should give at all a favourable response to my request—I am not now going to say one word as to the particular languages into which I think the Report might well be translated—I would only make two suggestions. First, that whatever translations have been or may be made should be kept in type for a considerable while in view of possible future demands; and, secondly, that the Government should lend a favourable ear to any suggestions that may be privately made from time to time as to further languages into which it might with advantage be translated.
THE LORD PRESIDENT OF THE COUNCIL (THE MARQUESS OF CREWE): My Lords, so far as regards one part of my noble friend's Question, there has already been action in the sense that he desires. Steps have already been taken by His Majesty's Government to translate this Paper into all the principal European languages, and I will see that the suggestion which my noble friend has made as to the retention of the various translations in type for a considerable time receives the notice of those who are responsible. As regards the languages of Asia, or any of them, that matter was also carefully considered, but at present I do not think that there would be an advantage in translating this Paper into any of the Asiatic languages. My noble friend may have some reasons to adduce to the contrary. That falls within the second suggestion which he made. If he has any

63
reasons to suppose that it would be desirable to translate this document into any particular language, of course we shall be glad to hear and to consider them carefully. But as at present advised I am disposed to limit the translations to the very large number of European languages into which it has already been arranged that the Paper should be rendered.

TERRITORIALS' PAY IN INDIA.
LORD HARRIS LORD HARRIS rose to ask His Majesty's Government whether they can now specify what improvements in pay and allowances have been granted to Territorial soldiers serving in India and Singapore.
The noble Lord said: My Lords, the subject of my Question has already been before your Lordships on two occasions, and I make no apology for again bringing it forward. The regiments to which it refers have been very unlucky. They accepted, as soldiers should, the duty they were called upon to perform, which, of course, was altogether outside their original contract, of going to India in the place of Regular regiments brought home for the Front. I can say without hesitation that these Territorials went out on the understanding that they were to do their training in that country and were to be brought back to serve at the Front before the end of the year. Instead of that they have been kept out. through the cold weather and now they must stay through the hot, because the trooping season has ended. Therefore they will be kept there for, I suppose, at least a year, though I should hope that before then the understanding—I think I may say it was as much as a promise—will be redeemed and they will be brought back. As regards individuals, there were in these regiments a great many more married men than are borne on the strength of Regular regiments, and there being this understanding, or misunderstanding, as to when they were to come back married officers and non-commissioned officers and married men in the ranks were quite unable to make any arrangements about taking their wives out. They have been at the expense of keeping up two homes, one for themselves out. there and one for their wives at home; and in the ranks, of course, the incubus of the allowance which the married men have had to make out of their pay has been excessively heavy. Consequently from every
64
point of view, both as regiments and as individuals, they have been, as I say, very unlucky.
The noble Marquess the Leader of the House, when the matter was brought to his notice, acknowledged that there was a case for consideration; and on the last occasion when Lord Selborne raised the question the noble Marquess said that something was going to be done which might cost a considerable sum of money to the India. Government. Then I understood that a Return was to be made which would give us some information on that point. The Return [Cd. 7949] was laid on the' Table this morning, but it affords no information as regards any advantages which are being given, or which it is proposed to give, to these regiments. I understood from the noble Marquess's last reply that an allowance was to be made in consideration of the disadvantages under which the Territorial in India is serving which would substantially acid to his daily pay. We have no information as to what that is, and that is the main answer which I am trying to obtain from the India Office.
The Return presented to-day purports to show that the Territorial gets as much pay in India as he does in England, but the fallacy of the comparison is that whereas Ire is extremely well fed in England and has not to supplement his daily ration out of his pay, in India he is very badly fed and is compelled to supplement his ration out of his pay. It is not very easy to understand this Return. For instance, in column (3) of the allowances in India you will find "Messing allowance, 1s. 3¾d." But if you look at the next column you will see that there is a messing deduction of Is. 3¾d. Where the man is better off I cannot see, because exactly the same sum as is given to him is deducted. What it amounts to is that the India Government claim that, after giving the Territorial the allowances which he gets and after the deductions which are made, he receives 6½d. in addition to his net pay. My information is that he only gets 2¾d., but the point is that he has to use. this residue to supplement. his ration. I have had letters from Territorial officers who are serving in India, and one of them—he was in a position to be capable of judging, because he had work of the kind to do when he was in England—calculates that a man gets about 2¾d. with which to supplement his

65
ration, and that a married man, who has to send home about 3s. 6d. a week, has tot got this. Were it not for the generous assistance of the unmarried men the married men would really, he says, not have enough to cat. The expression used—and I am sure your Lordships will feel it to be lamentable that any officer of a British regiment should be able to write such a thing of British soldiers in thee times—is that "The men ale miserably poor." I hope that the noble Lord who is going to reply will be able to reassure your Lordships that something substantial has been done—not is going to be clone, but has been done—to carry out the acknowledgment of the noble Marquess that it was necessary to do something for these regiments.
As regards proficiency pay, the noble Marquess admitted that in that respect the Territorial in India is worse off than the Regular in England. The reason is this. When the Territorials were mobilised the War Office Order laid down certain conditions under which they might draw proficiency pay. The Territorial had to have put in two camps in order to be able to draw proficiency pay. A lot of these men had never been in the Territorial Force before, and could not have attended any camp; therefore they could not draw proficiency pay until they had done the Army qualification. There were other men who, I dare say, would have been able to complete their two camps had it not been for the fact that a great many Territorial regiments were mobilised either when they were in camp or before they could go into camp last year, so that a great many of these men are disqualified from earning proficiency pay, and my information is that they have been refused it. If the reason for refusing them proficiency pay is that they had not put in two camps, then all I can say is that it is extremely niggardly and paltry; for although these men had not put in two camps of a fortnight each in two years—that is to say, one month's training—they had already put in before they went to India three months' training. Again I saw a complaint in one of the Indian papers that although the Territorial has done his musketry he does not draw the allowance which is said to be made to the Regular who has completed his musketry. Another point is that the Territorial is penalised if lie does not show a full soldier's kit at inspections. Yet these men say that in a great many cases they
66
were never issued a full soldier's kit; consequently they have to produce articles in their private possession in order to make up a full kit.
I intimated to the noble Lord that I should ask questions on these points. I therefore hope he will be able to give complete answers. I sincerely trust that we shall hear that the Government of India have recognised the very different conditions of the Territorial officer and man in India from those of the Regular officer and man, and that they have—some time ago, I should hope—made financial arrangements to supplement the pay or allowances of the Territorial in India in such a way as to put an end to such complaints as I have conveyed to your Lordships, particularly the complaint—one that no officer should be able to make of men serving in the British Army—that they are "miserably poor."
LORD ST. AUDRIES: My Lords, I regret to say that I also have received complaints from Territorials in India. There are two Somersetshire battalions serving out there, and from both have come complaints, in letters home to their relations, that they are not sufficiently paid and have to supplement the Government ration out of their rather scanty pay, that they practically have to pay entirely for breakfast and tea., and that there is a compulsory stoppage for cooking dinner. The complaints are, first, of the insufficiency of the food; and, secondly, of the heavy compulsory stoppages.
These Territorial battalions are in a quite different position in many ways from Regular battalions. In the first place, when Regulars go out from home in drafts to battalions in India they go to battalions which probably have been there two, three, or four years, the commanding officers and the quartermasters of which, and all the old soldiers, know the conditions of Indian life and are able to put these young drafts up to all the ways of eking out their allowances, and so on. But these Territorial battalions went out without any previous knowledge of India at all. Their commanding officers and quartermasters knew nothing of the conditions of India, and of what I believe to be the exactions which are occasionally imposed on green commanding officers by native dealers. There is another point of difference between Territorials and Regular soldiers. The

67
great mass of these Territorials who have gone out to India agreed voluntarily to give allowances to their dependants quite apart from the compulsory allowance. I should think that certainly seventy per cent. of them are making these voluntary allowances. Had they not been able to do that, a great many of them would have felt considerable compunction about enlisting. It is very rare in Line regiments for a soldier in India to send home regularly an allowance. He may send home something at Christmas and at other times, but not regularly. A deduction from a Territorial's pay for these allowances, running up to from ls. 9d. to 3s. 6d. a week, is a considerable one from pay of 7s. a week.
Turning to the question of proficiency pay, it does seem to me rather absurd that a man who has done at home two trainings in camp of fifteen days each should get 3d. and a sergeant 6d. a day more than a man who has done six months' training at home and getting on for four months' training in India. A man who has done two 15-day camps at home may be considered in time of peace a proficient soldier. He is certainly more proficient than a man who has not done any camp training. But you cannot compare that man with a Territorial who has done eight months' regular training with all the new tests: Kitchener marches, musketry, and so on. Obviously the latter is much more proficient. The hardship is this, that the great majority of these men enlisted on the outbreak of war and have not had any opportunity of going into camp. There is the still harder case of men who left the Volunteers before the Territorial Army was formed, and who afterwards joined the Territorials. Because they have not done the two 15-day camps these men are not to get proficiency pay. I venture to think that if the Government could see their way to grant proficiency pay in view of the training these Territorials have undergone it would do a great deal to remove the grievance.
I feel a personal interest in these men because I was instrumental, with what little influence I had, in getting scores and scores of them to join the Territorial Force. They were not men who came to the scratch late; they were men who cheerfully enlisted in August, before the Kitchener Army was formed, and who joined for the purpose of going to the Front and fighting. The great majority of them are bitterly
68
disappointed that they have not had the opportunity of going to the Front, and in all their letters home that I have seen they expre3s the hope that they are now, after the training they have had in India, considered efficient to take their place in the fighting line. Having used my influence to get men to join the Territorials I feel bound to stand up and tell your Lordships when I think they have a grievance. It is a grievance which could easily be put right, and I hope the Government will take up the question of proficiency pay as a first step towards remedying what really is a hard case.
THE UNDER-SECRETARY OF STATE FOR INDIA (LORD ISLINGTON): lily Lords, I will endeavour to reply to the Question on the Paper and also to the supplementary questions which the noble Lords have put forward. I regret very much that there has been delay in regard to an improvement in the conditions of pay and allowances to the Territorials in India, but the delay, as I think noble Lords will appreciate, has been to a large degree inevitable, owing to the fact that in order to arrive at a settlement of this question so many Departments have had to be consulted and their concurrence obtained. First of all the India Office had to consult the Government of India, who were best qualified on the spot to judge what the difficulties and grievances were, to what extent they were valid ones, and by what means they could be rectified. Next the consent of the War Office had to be obtained, and then that of the Treasury; and when noble Lords consider the high pressure upon all these Departments in these days of war emergency I think they will agree that there is at any rate some excuse for the delay that has occurred.
The pay, allowances, and deductions attached to forces in the Army have always constituted a difficult and complicated subject, and this complication has undoubtedly been accentuated under the novel conditions of sending Territorials to India. I venture to express my wholehearted concurrence, as will I am sure all other noble Lords, in the remarks that fell from Lord Harris and Lord St. Audries in regard to the patriotism of the Territorials in serving in India. They left their civil avocations and took up this distant and protracted Imperial obligation, and in doing so they are discharging

69
patriotic duties just as much as those who are serving at the Front and taking part in the active campaign. And speaking as one who has known the Territorials for many years I entirely concur with the noble Lord who said that there is no body of men in His Majesty's Forces to-day who are more desirous of taking an active part in the fighting line than the Territorial.
My noble friend the Leader of the House, in the discussion which took place last month, admitted, as the noble Lord said, that the Territorials in India were suffering under a legitimate grievance and that the matter deserved full consideration. He undertook, in consultation with the Government of India and the other Departments, to deal with the question and to ensure that the Territorial serving in India should enjoy conditions as far as possible on equal terms with the Territorial serving in this country. He also promised to have prepared a comparative statement showing the pay, allowances, and deductions of the Territorials serving in India and those of Territorials at home. That statement has been to-day laid on the Table of the House and. can be subjected to examination by noble Lords. I will not attempt to go into the details of this statement. Certain criticisms have been made in regard to it. But broadly speaking I would say this, that in regard to pay and deductions the position of the Territorial in India is the dame as the position of the Territorial stationed anywhere else. It is only in regard to ration allowance that there is a marked difference. But I would point out that the disparity shown by the Return in respect of ration allowance is not quite so bad as would appear, because the ration allowance of 12 s. 3d. to a Territorial at home as compared with that to a Territorial in India, which amounts in all to 5s., does not show, in effect, the exact respective figures. The arrangement in England, with very few exceptions, is for rations to be given in kind to the Territorials, and though it is impossible to ascertain the exact amount which those rations cost I am informed that by contract it would be considerably under the sum of 12 s. 3d., so that, as I have said, the disparity as between 5s. and 12 s. 3d. is not really in effect so great.
In. view of the great difficulties and anomalies that would arise from increasing
70
proficiency pay and altering the home service ration to field service ration in India, it has been decided by the Government of India and the other Departments that a daily increased ration allowance should be given to all Territorials in India, this additional allowance to be supplementary to any pay that they at present receive. The amount that it is proposed to give to all Territorials serving in India is as follows:—1st lieutenant, 1s. 4d. a day; 2nd lieutenant, 2s. 8d. a day; rank and file, 3d. a day; and, by the consent of the Treasury, I am pleased to be able to inform noble Lords that this additional allowance is to take effect from the date of landing in India, so that the additional grant will be a substantial sum in the pockets of those men who, as has been described by noble Lords, have suffered hardships.
It has been decided, however, not to touch the proficiency pay. Lord St. Audries suggested that considerable hardship was being experienced under the present conditions. I would point out that before the war no Territorial was eligible for proficiency pay at all; and Territorials are now only eligible for proficiency pay, which I am informed includes their course in musketry, if in other respects they have qualified. Those other respects come under three definite categories. They must either have served for two years as Territorials and attended camp both years for the full space of the fifteen days' training; or they must., in addition to completing one year's Territorial service before mobilisation, have rendered one year's mobilised service; or those who have joined the Territorials since the outbreak of the war must have rendered two years' mobilised service. Therefore a fraction of the old Territorials will be enjoying proficiency pm' to-day, and a considerable number will come in receipt of it in about two or three months time when the first year's mobilisation has expired; therefore to that extent the hardship suggested is at any rate of a diminishing character. The reason, I understand, why the War Office find it difficult in any way to interfere with proficiency pay is this, that it is the same in India as in the case of Territorials in other parts of the Empire, and if you make an exception on behalf of Territorials serving in India you will be immediately setting up a discrimination in favour of one

71
group of Territorials. This would be invidious and cause discontent., and therefore the Government consider, and I hope noble Lords will agree, that on the whole the wisest plan to meet the difficulties and complications of the case is to grant an additional allowance on the lines that I have indicated and dating, as I have said, from the day of disembarkation in India.
have been asked by my noble friend who represents the War Office to reply to the other part of Lord Harris's Question in regard to the Territorials quartered in Singapore. The position at present in -regard to those Territorials is this, that they receive the same treatment as Regular soldiers. In the Straits Settlements the troops, including officers, draw full field service ration—that is the same ration as is enjoyed by Territorials in this country—and the usual Army colonial allowance is given to officers and warrant officers to meet the extra cost of living there as compared with the cost in this country. In order to be quite satisfied that there are no hardships attaching, to the troops in Singapore, a telegram has been sent to the General Officer Commanding asking what their conditions are, whether there are any grievances, and, if so, what proposals should be made. An answer has not yet been received, but directly it arrives the information will be conveyed to the noble Lord. But it would appear, on the face of it, that the Territorial in Singapore and the Straits Settlements, in view of the fact that he is in receipt of field service ration, has not so complete a. complaint to make as undoubtedly the Territorial had in the past in India.
VISCOUNT MIDLETON: My Lords, I am sure the House will have heard with satisfaction the statement which the noble Lord has just made. On the last occasion when this subject was discussed the noble Marquess the Leader of the House, in reply to a question which I put to him, undertook that the case of Territorial medical officers now serving in India should be considered, and I have only risen to express the hope that, although they have not been referred to in the statement to which we have just listened, their case will not be forgotten. We all know the sacrifices which have been made by Territorial officers and
72
who have gone to India, but in some cases the sacrifices made by Territorial medical officers have been infinitely greater. Their case is a particularly hard one, and were sufficient public attention called to it I believe we should have no further halting in the matter. Medical officers who have enlisted since the beginning of the war enjoy a larger pay and bonus, and the medical officers who have been assigned to the new Army also receive higher pay. I do not know whether Lord Islington is in a position to make any statement on this question, but it directly involves the India Office. I have reason to believe that the War Office are favourable to an increased allowance being given to the Territorial medical officer; now serving in India. Perhaps the noble Lord who represents the Treasury, Lord Hylton, will be able to tell us off-hand whether or not the Treasury look favourably upon the War Office representations with regard to these officers. But the point I would urge is that this question has been under consideration now for several months, and, as my noble friend Lord Harris pointed out, the stay of these regiments in India has been infinitely more prolonged than they supposed would be the case when they went out eight or nine months ago. Bis dat qui cito dat really applies in this case. May I ask the noble Lord whether he will try to thread the mazes of the Departments and arrive at a conclusion with regard to these medical officers, and, if possible, announce it to your Lordships at an early date.
LORD ISLINGTON: I will certainly consult my colleagues in the India Office as to whether anything can be done in the direction suggested by the noble Viscount, but I am given to understand that the condition of the Territorial medical officer in India is on all fours with that of the Territorial medical officer serving in other parts of the Empire; so that were any improvement in the condition of the former projected you would immediately conic up against the difficulty to which I alluded just now of discrimination in favour of one group of Territorials. If the noble Viscount could point out specifically in what way the Territorial medical officer in India is suffering from hardships which the Territorial medical officer in England and elsewhere is not suffering from, it would simplify my inquiry in the Office.
VISCOUNT MIDLETON: The Territorial medical officer has had to pay somebody at home to look after his practice while he is in India, and in many cases after making this payment he has absolutely nothing left with which to maintain himself and his family. When the War Office wished to supplement the number of these officers in order to have sufficient for the new Territorial regiments as well as for the new Army, they found they were obliged to offer a higher rate of remuneration. So that tic Territorial medical officer who joined before the war, and had, perhaps, for years past given time and money to training, is in a worse position than the man who came in after the war. Unwittingly considerable hardship has been thrown on these medical officers, and I could send the noble Lord a pile of correspondence which would convince him that the case is one for immediate consideration. I may say that I would be the last person to ask the Government to add to the enormous charges which are now falling on the country except in a case of really proved hardship.
THE EARL or DARTMOUTH: With regard to the point that if certain things were done for the Territorials in India other Territorials would expect the same, may I suggest that, as the Territorials in India are prejudiced by having to satisfy four Departments, any concession to them might be looked upon as a just compensation for the trouble they had had to go through.
LORD HARRIS: It may seem rather audacious on. my part to suggest to the noble Viscount, Lord Midleton, that he is addressing the wrong Department, but I should have thought that the point which he raised was more a War Office than an India Office question; and. possibly the Paymaster-General aright be disposed to take up the matter and look into it and give us a reply- in that style which attracted us so much when he sat on these Benches. The grievance was published in a letter in The Times not very long ago. It is this, that the medical officers who had been serving for years—some of them in the old Volunteers and afterwards in the Territorial Army up to the date of mobilisation —are, according to the letter in The Times, which has never been contradicted. £150 a year worse off than the medical officers who joined the Territorial Army subse-
74
quently. The War Office, I presume, found that they could not get sufficient medical men to officer the new battalions without giving higher pay. The result is that the old Territorial medical officers who for years have been putting in patriotic service are not only:£150 a year worse off now, but I believe will be worse off by a £60 bonus at the end of the war, than the medical officers who recently came in. If that is true, it does seem to me a serious hardship not only on Territorial medical officers in India but on Territorial medical officers serving elsewhere. I thank the noble Lord for his full and. clear reply to my Question. I understand that the increased allowance represents a clear 3d. a day in excess of everything the Territorial now receives, and in excess of proficiency pay if he is earning it.
THE PAYMASTER-GENERAL (LORD NEWTON): As my noble friend opposite has made a more or less direct appeal to me, I feel constrained to reply that, much to my regret, I find myself unable to supply him with any information on the subject. This question has been brought up quite unexpectedly as far as I am concerned, and I am bound to take refuge in the common expedient of asking noble Lords opposite to be good enough to put a Motion on the Paper.

CHAPLAINS WITH THE ARMY.
THE LORD ARCHBISHOP OF CANTERBURY: My Lords, in venturing to ask His Majesty's Government what is at present the proportion of chaplains to men actually serving with the Expenditionary Force, I am anxious to make clear that I do not do so as a mere matter of statistical curiosity nor with a desire to make any complaint against the War Office, who have from the first shown a full consideration of the importance of, from their view, an adequate supply of chaplains; still less do I want to complain of the action in this matter of the Chaplain General, who had extended throughout the utmost considerateness and courtesy to all the inquiries we have made.
The reason I put the Question is this. I and many other Bishops continue to receive private letters from officers and men at the Front who complain in general terms,

75
not officially of course, that there is a strange absence of an adequate supply of chaplains at a time when chaplains are most wanted. They say that in some places there are practically no chaplains at all, and they contrast the position of members of other Churches with their own as members of the Church of England. An enormous percentage—something like 70 per cent. or more—of the men in all ordinary regiments belong to the Church of England, and the supply of chaplains in proportion to the men is supposed by many of those who write to us to be very much more ample in the case of those who are not members of the Church of England than it is in the case of those who are. I find it difficult to form any opinion on matters of that kind in the absence of a full statistical statement of what is, as a matter of fact, the number of chaplains at present assigned to the troops in proportion to the number of men serving, and it is in order to have those facts quite clearly before us that I ask this Question. When we have the figures and are able to see what the Government consider the proper number, we shall be able to judge whether the complaints which have been made are justified; and I should probably desire, if necessary, to raise the question again on the basis of the information which will then be furnished to us.
I should like to say that the testimony has been universal as to the appreciation of the services of our chaplains, and I think many of your Lordships must be aware that a good many of those who are now serving are anxious that there should be a larger number in the field of men who, at a time such as the present, are called for day and night—it is a constant requirement—and whose services in such conditions have been appreciated to the full. I should be glad if we might at least have the statistical facts which will enable us to judge whether or not the complaints which reach us seem to be well-founded.
LORD NEWTON: My Lords, it is not considered desirable by the War Office to state the exact proportion of chaplains to the men actually serving with the Expeditionary Force, as this would disclose the actual number of troops in France. But as regards the number of chaplains I am able to supply the most rev. Primate with the following particulars. The number of chaplains of the different denominations who had been posted up to the 12th of June (including Canadian chaplains and chaplains of the Indian Establishment) was as follows:—Church of England, 213; Roman Catholic, 96; Presbyterians, 55; Wesleyans, 34; United Board (including Congregationalists, Primitive Methodists, and others), 27; making a total of 425. The establishment is four chaplains to each Infantry Brigade, comprising one Church of England, one Roman Catholic, and one Presbyterian or Nonconformist, and in addition one of the predominating denomination. One chaplain is also allowed for the Divisional Troops of each Division. There are three chaplains also with each General and Stationary Hospital and Casualty Clearing Station. The present establishment of chaplains was arrived at as a result of a conference held at General Headquarters between the military authorities and the representatives of the various religious denominations. Perhaps I ought to add that the particulars which I have given apply only to the Expeditionary Force in France.

BUSINESS OF THE HOUSE.
LORD ISLINGTON: My Lords, as there is no business on the Paper for to-morrow I beg to move that, except for Judicial business, the House do adjourn until Tuesday next, June 22.
Moved accordingly, and, on Question, Motion agreed to.
House adjourned at twenty-five minutes punt Five o'clock, till To-morrow, half-past Ten o'clock.