HL Deb 26 May 1884 vol 288 cc1275-6

Order of the Day for the Second Reading read.

LORD SUDELEY

, in rising to move that the Bill be now read a second time, said, its object was to enable the Metropolitan Board of Works to direct what proportion of the expense of the improvements should be defrayed by the parishes.

THE MARQUESS OF SALISBURY

, interposing, inquired whether this was not a privileged Bill?

THE EARL OF KIMBERLEY

said, the Bill simply affected the rates, and the practice was less severe with regard to rates than it was with regard to taxation.

THE MARQUESS OF SALISBURY

observed that this might be made a precedent for future occasions.

THE EARL OF CAMPERDOWN

said, it was remarkable that when it suited the Government they pleaded that Bills were privileged; but, on the other hand, when they wanted to go on they ignored the question of privilege. He hoped the question would be settled on this Bill.

LORD SUDELEY

said, that as there appeared to be some doubt on the matter he begged to postpone his Motion for the second reading of the Bill until after Whitsuntide.

Second Reading put off to Tuesday the 17th of June next.