§ EARL GRANVILLEMy Lords, I have to state to your Lordships, in addition to what I said on two previous occasions, that Mr. Gladstone and his Colleagues—having ascertained that Mr. Disraeli, although he felt himself able to form an efficient Government and one likely to command the confidence of Her 1920 Majesty, could not undertake to do so in. the present Parliament; and having further ascertained that it was not Mr. Disraeli's intention to advise Her Majesty to dissolve Parliament—have carefully considered what it was their duty to do under these circumstances; and they have felt that there was no alternative open to them but to resume their offices. They will accordingly do so with every desire to perform their duty to the country, and in the hope that they will receive the support of Parliament.
§ THE DUKE OF RICHMONDMy Lords, I wish to say a few words on the subject which the noble Earl has now brought under the notice of the House—namely, the resumption of office by Mr. Gladstone and his Colleagues in the Government. The noble Earl has correctly stated what took place on Thursday evening. Her Majesty wrote to Mr. Disraeli a letter informing him that Mr. Gladstone, in consequence of the Vote previously come to, had tendered his resignation and that of his Colleagues, and that Her Majesty had accepted those resignations; and, asking Mr. Disraeli whether he would undertake to form a Government. Her Majesty requested him to attend at Buckingham Palace that evening at 6 o'clock. Mr. Disraeli according waited on the Queen, and informed Her Majesty that, while he was ready to undertake to form a Government which should efficiently carry on the affairs of the country, and which he felt would deserve the confidence of Her Majesty, he was not prepared to do so in the present House of Commons. Her Majesty, acting as she always does on occasions of a similar character, made no obstacle whatever in the event of Mr. Disraeli wishing to advise Her Majesty to dissolve the present Parliament. But it must be perfectly obvious to all who look into this question that a dissolution of Parliament, such as that which Her Majesty would have undertaken, had Mr. Disraeli recommended it, would not have met the difficulty of the case in any way whatever. The state of Business in the other House is such that it would be quite impossible that the present Parliament could be dissolved before that period at which Parliament usually separates at the end of the Session. Measures of great importance would have had to be considered by Mr. Disraeli's Government; and they would have been 1921 exposed during the remainder of the Session to adverse Votes from various sections of the House of Commons; and they would have been liable to be placed in minorities on various questions which might be brought forward by the Liberal side of the House. Your Lordships will, I think, agree with me that for Mr. Disraeli to undertake the Government under such a condition of things would be detrimental to the Executive, prejudicial to the administration of affairs, and, I think, injurious to the Crown of this country. My Lords, such being the case, Mr. Disraeli respectfully declined to form a Government. I have heard it stated—my noble Friend (Earl Granville) has not asserted it now—but I have heard it stated—that unless Mr. Disraeli had been prepared to form an Administration he should not have put Her Majesty's Government in a minority on the Vote which was taken 10 days ago. To those who have advanced that proposition I venture to answer that the Vote come to on a recent occasion was the result of no combination whatever. At a very early stage of the debate Sir Michael Hicks-Beach distinctly stated the views of the party of which Mr. Disraeli is the Leader and their intention to vote against the Bill. Only at a late period of the debate was it known that any great body of Gentlemen representing Irish constituencies were likely to vote with the Opposition and so put Her Majesty's Government in a minority. For that, therefore, the party of which Mr. Disraeli is the head were in no way responsible. They felt bound to vote against a measure which in their consciences they believed would be very injurious to Ireland and to this country as well. My Lords, the theory that the party of which Mr. Disraeli is the head ought to carry on the Government even though they are in a minority is one of a very peculiar character; for it is perfectly evident that if it were carried out to its fullest extent the administration of public affairs in this country must come to a dead lock. I believe Mr. Disraeli has adopted the course which he ought to have taken, and that in future it will be said that the position he now occupies sheds additional lustre on his name as one of the greatest statesmen of the day.
§ EARL GRANVILLEMy Lords, I may perhaps be allowed to observe that in consequence of the statement of my 1922 noble Friend (the Duke of Richmond) the other evening, that Mr. Disraeli would explain in the other House the communications which had taken place with Her Majesty, we thought it would be better that the public should know from Mr. Gladstone the exact details of what had occurred; and I therefore refrained from entering into the matter. With regard to the argument which my noble Friend has thought right to put forward, I am not aware that anyone has ever held the doctrine that no Opposition is at any time to put a Government in a minority unless it is prepared to undertake the Government. The question may have been raised whether the Ministry, having been put in a minority, and great pains having been taken to effect that result, it is not in accordance with all former precedents that some attempts should be made and some time taken by the Opposition with the view of forming a Government.