HL Deb 12 June 1873 vol 216 cc831-2
LORD BUCKHURST

said, he had to remind their Lordships that he had on several previous occasions drawn their Lordships' attention to the question of Railway Accidents and the destruction of life resulting therefrom. He had again to trouble their Lordships on the subject. He would at present confine himself to the question of accidents to persons employed by Railway Companies. He found by Captain Tyler's Report for 1872 that 347 persons so employed had been killed during the past year, and 365 had been seriously injured. He believed that these included persons who were not exactly in the employment of Railway Companies, but who were relatives or friends of persons so employed; so that some deduction should be made from the total number. He believed that most of those accidents were caused by carelessness on the part of the men themselves, and by defective machinery and arrangements. An Act had been passed obliging Railway Companies to send in a return to the proper Government authorities; but he much feared that that law was not very strictly observed. He understood it had been laid down as law that a railway servant could not claim compensation for an injury which had been occasioned by the negligence of another railway servant, and that the relatives of a railway servant who had been killed under similar circumstances could not obtain compensation from the Company. Surely, if this was the case, it was a defect in the law which should be remedied. Instead, however, of an alteration in the law, he should like to leave the Railway Companies to take the matter in hand, and provide a system of compensation for the benefit of the survivors of those killed in their service. It appeared from statistics which had been criticized in the newspapers that a large number of railway servants had been killed from time to time, and that their survivors had received nothing in the shape of compensation. He had been told that on the Great Northern Railway alone, within a radius of 60 miles, 60 children had been made orphans since the 1st of January. These were the children of persons who had been in the service of the Railway Company; and in every case, as he was informed, compensation was refused. The want of a sufficient number of hands might also account for many of these accidents. It was well-known that on more than one railway the men had to be on duty for too many hours at a spell. He had been told that there were pointsmen on the Great Northern line who had to work 84 hours a-week, and that some of them had not had a holiday for 18 months.

Moved, That there be laid before the House— Return of the number of persons in the service of each railway company in the United Kingdom who had been killed or seriously injured in the discharge of their duties from the 1st of January, 1872, to the 1st of June, 1873, and of the amount of compensation given by the Company in each case."—(The Lord Buckhurst.)

EARL COWPER

said, that the Act which required the Railway Companies to furnish Returns of the numbers of persons in their service to whom accidents might occur each year was passed only in 1871, and that 1872 was the first year for which a complete Return could be made out. The Returns for 1872 were all, therefore, that could be produced. These were in the hands of the printer, and would be laid before Parliament, he hoped, in a few days; therefore all he could promise the noble Earl at present was Returns up to December, 1872. The noble Earl would have to wait till 1873 for the whole of the Returns asked for.

Motion amended, and agreed to.

Ordered, that there be laid before the House— Return of the number of persons in the service of each railway company in the United Kingdom who have been killed or seriously injured in the discharge of their duties from the 1st of January 1872 to the 31st of December 1872; and of the amount of compensation given by the company in each case.—(The Lord Buckhurst.)