HL Deb 28 July 1862 vol 168 cc905-6

Bill read 3a (according to Order), with the Amendments.

LORD RAVENSWORTH

said, that there ought to be an appeal against the decisions of the Metropolitan Board, and moved an additional clause, to the effect that any vestry, board of works, or person aggrieved might have an appeal to the Court of Quarter Sessions.

On Question, "Whether the said Clause be there inserted?" their Lordships divided:—Contents 11; Not-Contents 15: Majority 4.

CONTENTS.
Manchester, D. Dungannon, V.
Bath, M. [Teller]. Churston, L.
Salisbury, M. Colchester, L.
Denman, L.
Romney, E. Ravensworth, L. [Teller.]
De Vesci, V. Redesdale, L.
NOT-CONTENTS.
Westbury, L. (L. Chancellor.) Ebury, L.
Foley, L. [Teller.]
Newcastle, D. Llanover, L. [Teller.]
Silchester, L. (E. Longford.]
De Grey, E.
Fortescue, E. Sundridge, L. (D. Argyll.)
Granville, E.
Powis, E. Walsingham, L.
Saint Germans, E. Wensleydale, L.
Stradbroke, E.

Resolved in the Negative.

Bill passed.

[25° & 26° Vict., c. 102.]