§ The Earl of Aberdeensaid, that a rumour was now prevalent, respecting the accuracy of which he wished to put a question to the noble Viscount. It was said, that letters of marque and reprisal had issued against China. He wished to know if that report were well founded, and, if so, whether it was intended to bring down any message from the Crown to Parliament on the subject?
§ Viscount Melbournereplied, that the rumour to which the noble Earl referred was not well founded. Her Majesty's Government intended to demand reparation for the injury done to the property of British subjects. If that reparation were not obtained, then it was intended to proceed gainst the trade of the Chinese. For that purpose, it would be necessary to institute courts to authorize the sale of such vessels and cargoes as might be seized. If reparation were made, of course no letters of marque would issue.
§ The Earl of Aberdeenrose to remind the noble Viscount, that he had omitted to slate whether or not there was to be a message from the Crown.
§ Viscount Melbournesaid, there would not be any message.
§ Lord Colchester(as we understood) stated, that he had been informed of the departure of a large steamer from Portsmouth having letters of marque on board.
§ Viscount Melbournereplied, that she belonged to the East India Company, and was going out to India.
§ Subject dropped.