Deb 21 June 1820 vol 1 cc1202-6
Mr. Wilberforce

having been called on by the Speaker, an interval of several minutes elapsed before he made his appearance. When he at length entered the House, he rose and observed, that he should certainly have persevered in bringing the subject of his promised motion before the House that day, but for some cause which it was not in his power to avoid. The fact was, that since the House separated last night, circumstances had taken place which rendered it necessary for him to vary the motion which he had intended to make. He must add, that he made his present application with the most sincere sorrow; but, considering this as perhaps the only means now left of avoiding that fatal inquiry which presented so many lamentable consequences—he would say, so many horrors—to his mind, he could not but hope that the House would excuse him for asking his noble friend to give him another day for the bringing on of his motion—[Loud cries of "No, no."] He was sure that, how great soever might be the wish of any gentleman—and a very natural one it was—that this important question should no longer remain in suspense, he should hold himself in contempt, if he could even suppose himself to be actuated by temporary motives in a case which so deeply involved the honour of the Crown and the interests of the people. His motives, however, were of so serious a character a to justify the application he now made.

Lord Castlereagh

deeply regretted that his hon. friend should have been induced by any motives—which, although he had not explained them, and though they were not before the House, he could well conceive the hon. gentleman had good reasons for not explaining—to call on him to postpone that motion which, in point of form, would not take precedence of his hon. friend's. For himself, he should wish the hon. gentleman to bring his motion on to-morrow, rather than any thing should prevent its coming on conformably to his own wishes. Certainly he did feel, without pressing any unfair inquiry into his hon. friend's motives for this delay, that on public and private grounds he might give him credit for the gravity of those motives, and that the House might accede to his request upon that principle of accommodation which parliament had always recognised as the most desirable to be acted on in such cases. Under these circumstances he should think that he departed from those principles which had actuated the conduct of his majesty's government, if he pressed the hon. gentleman to go farther into an explanation of his motives in demanding this delay, or if he did not add that he felt satisfied that every reasonable expedient, every possible measure had been resorted to by the hon. gentleman in order to obviate the necessity for such an application: but he was quite sure, while he was thus ready to admit that application, that the hon. gentleman must be aware of the great public evil which must result from any delay (beyond one of this kind which had been solicited upon public grounds), in consequence of the tendency which the many difficulties of this peculiar case had to agitate the public mind. Under all the many difficulties which the circumstances of the case had thrown around it, it was yet most imperative that it should now be proceeded in. He submitted to the request of his hon. friend, but he must conjure and entreat him not to be induced, by any consideration, to delay his motion beyond to-morrow, for he was sure that the evils of delay were incalculable. If the House were not already aware of its disadvantages, he could assure, the hon. gentleman such a call for inquiry existed upon all sides, that delay beyond to-morrow would be more likely to be injurious than beneficial in its results.

Mr. Wilberforce

begged leave to say, in answer to what had fallen from the noble lord, who had given him credit for the propriety of his motives, that he would explain them fully to-morrow.

Lord Castlereagh

felt assured, that his hon. friend could not suppose, that he wished him to explain them at present, or that he did not at all times give him entire credit for the soundness of his motives.

Lord A. Hamilton

begged to ask the hon. gentleman whether he had any objection now to state what would be the grounds of the motion postponed until to- morrow. He did not ask this question from any idle curiosity, but because he wished also to submit a motion upon the subject, and therefore was desirous to ascertain whether he should bring it forward as an amendment upon that of the hon. gentleman, or in what other way.

Mr. Wilberforce

had that respect for the character of the noble lord which would induce him at all times to give him every satisfaction in his power; and if he were willing to converse with him in private upon the subject, he should have no objection to give him the explanation, provided no other use were made of it. From what he had stated, the House would suppose that there might be circumstances which would vary his motion in some shape. He would add, that what had passed in the course of yesterday, had rather confirmed than altered his determination not to make any disclosure of the grounds of his motion.

Mr. Tierney

owned that he had very great difficulty in agreeing to this application from the hon. member for Bramber; because, with as much anxiety as any other gentleman could possibly feel, that any reasonable delay should be granted, he thought that their present mode of proceeding was incompatible with the dignity of the House. They were placed in a situation perfectly unexampled. They had received a message from tile Crown, accompanied by papers which were laid upon the table; they had answered that message by saying that they would take it into immediate consideration. In consequence of a motion of his hon. friend, an adjournment was agreed to; negotiations in the meanwhile were entered into, which continued nearly a fortnight. At the end of that time the noble lord brought down the result of them; and now his hon. friend begged another day in order to see what he could do. When were these adjournments to stop? Other hon. gentlemen might have similar motions to propose, and a noble lord had just given notice that it was his intention to submit one to-morrow connected with this subject. In the meanwhile the king's message was allowed to sleep, in a manner which was not very respectful to the Crown. Whether the noble lord (Castlereagh) himself would or would not to-morrow be disposed to concede a farther adjournment, if called for, he (Mr. Tierney) would then take the sense of the House on the propriety of any farther adjournment beyond that day.

Lord A. Hamilton

said, he intended tomorrow to Submit a motion for the production of the original order in council under which her majesty's name was erased from the liturgy.

Mr. Brougham

said, that if he rightly understood the hon. member for Bramber, he had contended, either that the House must admit his motion, or, as the necessary consequence of its rejection, must proceed with the inquiry. If it were so, he did think that one single day's delay could not be denied to his hon. friend; but then it would be clearly understood, that if that motion failed, the House would immediately proceed to the inquiry. Under all these circumstances, he would cheerfully accede to the proposed delay. He did hope and trust, however, that no circumstances would prevent his hon. friend from proceeding to-morrow; for he could assure the House that whatever anxiety was manifested on the part of his majesty's ministers, that no possible protraction of this business should occur: her majesty and her legal advisers were, on their part, equally anxious that no delay should be interposed.

Mr. Scarlett

understood the hon. gentleman's motion to be one branch of ah alternative, of which the other branch was an inquiry; but he could not agree with his hon. and learned friend that if that motion were rejected, no alternative but that inquiry was left; for, whatever might be the judgment of the House upon the case before them, he should still think that that sort of inquiry which had been proposed by ministers, and which was the only measure yet submitted to parliament by them, was one which the House never could be induced to adopt. It was so unconstitutional, that he conceived the House never would enter upon it.

Mr. Brougham

said, that his hon. and learned friend seemed to forget that he (Mr. B.) had been stating, not his own sentiment as to any alternative between the motion of the hon. member for Bramber and an inquiry, but what was his understanding of the views entertained by that hon. gentleman. Did it follow that, because he stated such to be his notion upon the subject, he therefore necessarily concurred in those views?, It was a motion which, for any thing his hon. and learned friend knew, he (Mr. B.) might mean to oppose, and it was one which, in effect, he did last night give, notice of his intention to oppose [Hear!].

Here the conversation was dropped; and the order of the day for resuming the adjourned debate on the king's message was discharged, and a new order made for to-morrow.