HC Deb 03 March 1975 vol 887 cc1201-25

11.0 p.m.

Mr. Graham Page

I beg to move Amendment No. 332, in page 3, line 1, leave out lines 1 to 5 and insert—

  1. '(a) is made within such reasonable time and in such appropriate form and manner, and
  2. (b) contains such relevant information, and
  3. (c) is accompanied by such available evidential documents'.
Clause 3 gives relief from VAT to "do-it-yourself" builders—at least, that is what the marginal note to the clause says—[Interruption.]

Mr. Speaker

Order. Will the hon. Members please stop their conversations and listen to the right hon. Gentleman?

Mr. Page

I am obliged, Mr. Speaker. Since the amendment relates to "do-it-yourself" matters, I was trying to do it myself and make myself heard.

It is strange that Clause 3 introduces Clause 15A into the Finance Act 1972 but puts another marginal note to the new clause, namely, Refund of tax to persons constructing new homes otherwise than in the course of a business". We are therefore dealing, not with the amateur who builds for himself, but with a person who may well build voluntarily for a member of his family or a relative—perhaps a bungalow for grandpa at the bottom of his garden.

The amendment deals with regulations under which the refund of tax may be claimed. It therefore deals with subsection (2) of the new Clause 15A. Subsection (2) gives the Commissioners of Inland Revenue very wide and very vague powers to make regulations—too wide and too vague. When the House gives a Minister power to legislate by order, it should take the greatest care to define that power carefully and to specify clearly its limitations, particularly when the power is given, not to a specific Minister, but, as in this case, to the commissioners. The power should clearly relate to the purpose for which it is given and it should go no further than is necessary for that purpose.

That is why in the amendment I propose that when a person claims relief of VAT because he is building a dwellinghouse and he is not in the trade of a builder he should be required only to make the claim within reasonable time, that he should be required to make it in appropriate form and in appropriate manner, that he should be required to give only relevant information, and that he should be required to submit with it only available evidential documents.

If the power to make regulations went as wide as it does in the Bill it might nullify the right to relief by requiring impossible or impertinent information or non-existent documents. Secondly, it might be objectionable by prying into family arrangements under which the dwellinghouse is being constructed.

I put the case shortly, but it is a matter of constitutional importance because the power of delegated legislation should be specifically defined in any parent statute.

The Financial Secretary to the Treasury (Dr. John Gilbert)

I am grateful to the right hon. Member for Crosby (Mr. Page) for the dispassionate way in which, as usual, he has moved the amendment. Like the passage in the Bill which it seeks to replace, the amendment has three paragraphs. I join the right hon. Gentleman in the sentiments he expressed in respect of the first two paragraphs. The requirements that the claim be made in a reasonable time, that it be made in an appropriate form and manner and that it contain relevant information are not matters I wish to dispute with him. It is self-evident that that is the manner in which the regulations made by the Commissioners would run. If the right hon. Gentleman is not satisfied with that assurance from me, to reassure him I will spell out certain safeguards that are available.

However, when one comes to paragraph (c) one runs up against difficulties. The right hon. Gentleman seeks to import into the Bill that the documents shall be both available and evidential. By introducing a restriction of that sort the inference is to be drawn that a claimant could submit a claim for an amount substantially in excess of that for which there was documentary supporting evidence. If the right hon. Gentleman ponders that for a moment I am sure he will see that it would make the task of Customs and Excise in policing claims for refunds under the Bill a virtual impossibility.

The amendment requires that documents accompanying a claim should all be evidential—to use his word. Customs would intend such a requirement to apply to the bulk of the documents. However, in certain circumstances Customs might require supplementary information to deal quickly and economically with a claim. Here again I must part company with the right hon. Gentleman.

All regulations for claims would have to be made by means of a statutory instrument which would always be subject to the negative procedure of the House. If the House were not satisfied that the regulations required that the claim be made in reasonable time and in proper manner and that it contained relevant information, it would always be open to the House to negative the resolution.

I hope that I have said enough to reassure the right hon. Gentleman that there is no issue between us on the first two-thirds of the amendment. The last part probably goes rather wider than the right hon. Gentleman intends, and I cannot recommend it to my hon. Friends.

Sir G. Howe

I appreciate the Financial Secretary's endeavour to approach the amendment in a reasonable fashion. It is not one of overwhelming importance but nevertheless it goes to some practical points to which my right hon. Friend has drawn attention.

I cannot advise my hon. and right hon. Friends that I am satisfied with the hon. Gentleman's reply. He seeks to reassure us by saying that paragraphs (a) and (b) are unnecessary becauses they will always happen anyway, which is a good reason for accepting that part of the amendment. The Financial Secretary went on to assert that paragraph (c) could lead to inflated claims being made and let through. I see no reason to join him in reaching that conclusion.

He says that the form presently contained in the Bill is necessary to enable supplementary information which might be required by the authorities to be delivered. That again does not follow. Any supplementary information could be obtained under subpara (b) of the amendment. In those circumstances, the important point raised by subpara (c) of the amendment cannot be dealt with sufficiently merely by asserting that the negative resolution procedure will allow this House to deal with the matter properly.

If the business of the Government coming before this House continues to be handled as it has been so far, we can place little reliance on the validity of the negative resolution procedure for protecting the rights of citizens. In those circumstances, I must advise my right hon. Friends that the assurances given by the Financial Secretary are quite insufficient and invite them to join me in supporting the amendment.

Question put, That the amendment be made:—

The House divided: Ayes 247, Noes 274.

Division No. 117.] AYES [11.11 p.m.
Adley, Robert Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham) Brittan, Leon
Aitken, Jonathan Benyon, W. Brotherton, Michael
Alison, Michael Berry, Hon Anthony Brown, Sir Edward (Bath)
Amery, Rt Hon Julian Biffen, John Bryan, Sir Paul
Atkins, Rt Hon H. (Spelthorne) Biggs-Davison, John Buchanan-Smith, Alick
Awdry, Daniel Blaker, Peter Buck, Antony
Baker, Kenneth Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown) Budgen, Nick
Banks, Robert Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent) Bulmer, Esmond
Beith, A. J. Braine, Sir Bernard Carlisle, Mark
Chalker, Mrs Lynda Howells, Geraint (Cardigan) Peyton, Rt Hon John
Churchill, W. S. Hurd, Douglas Pink, R. Bonner
Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton) James, David Powell, Rt Hon J. Enoch
Clark, William (Croydon S) Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd & W'df'd) Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe) Jessel, Toby Rathbone, Tim
Clegg, Walter Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead) Rawlinson, Rt Hon Sir Peter
Cockcroft, John Jones Arthur (Daventry) Rees, Peter (Dover & Deal)
Cooke, Robert (Bristol W) Jopling, Michael Rees-Davies, W. R.
Cope, John Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Corrie, John Kaberry, Sir Donald Renton, Tim (Mid-Sussex)
Costain, A. P. Kellett-Bowman, Mrs Elaine Rhys Williams, Sir Brandon
Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E) Kershaw, Anthony Ridley, Hon Nicholas
Crouch, David Kimball, Marcus Ridsdale, Julian
Crowder, F. P. King, Evelyn (South Dorset) Rifkind, Malcolm
Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford) King, Tom (Bridgwater) Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
Dean, Paul (N Somerset) Kirk, Peter Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Dodsworth, Geoffrey Kitson, Sir Timothy Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James Knight, Mrs Jill Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)
du Cann, Rt Hon Edward Lamont, Norman Ross, William (Londonderry)
Durant, Tony Lane, David Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Eden, Rt Hon Sir John Langford-Holt, Sir John Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)
Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke) Latham, Michael (Melton) Royle, Sir Anthony
Elliott, Sir William Lawrence, Ivan Sainsbury, Tim
Emery, Peter Lawson, Nigel St. John-Stevas, Norman
Eyre, Reginald Le Marchant, Spencer Scott, Nicholas
Fairbairn, Nicholas Lester, Jim (Beeston) Scott-Hopkins, James
Fairgrieve, Russell Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland) Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)
Farr, John Loveridge, John Shaw, Michael (Scarborough)
Fell, Anthony Luce, Richard Shelton, William (Streatham)
Finsberg Geoffrey McCrindle, Robert Shepherd, Colin
Fisher, Sir Nigel McCusker, H. Shersby, Michael
Fletcher, Alex (Edinburgh N) Macfarlane, Neil Sims, Roger
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles MacGregor, John Sinclair, Sir George
Fowler Norman (Sutton C'f'd) Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham) Skeet, T. H. H.
Fox, Marcus McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury) Smith, Cyril (Rochdale)
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford & St) Madel, David Smith, Dudley (Warwick)
Fry, Peter Marshall, Michael (Arundel) Speed, Keith
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D. Marten, Neil Spence, John
Gardiner, George (Reigate) Mather, Carol Spicer, Jim (W Dorset)
Gardner, Edward (S Fylde) Maude, Angus Spicer, Michael (S Worcester)
Gilmour, Rt Hon Ian (Chesham) Maudling, Rt Hon Reginald Sproat, Iain
Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife) Mawby, Ray Stanbrook, Ivor
Glyn, Dr Alan Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin Stanley, John
Goodhew, Victor Mayhew, Patrick Steel, David (Roxburgh)
Goodlad, Alastair Meyer, Sir Anthony Steen, Anthony (Wavertree)
Gorst, John Mills, Peter Stewart, Ian (Hitchin)
Gow, Ian (Eastbourne) Miscampbell, Norman Stokes, John
Gower Sir Raymond (Barry) Mitchell, David (Basingstoke) Stradling Thomas, J.
Grant, Anthony (Harrow C) Moate, Roger Taylor, R. (Croydon NW)
Gray, Hamish Molyneaux, James Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart)
Grieve, Percy Monro, Hector Tebbit, Norman
Griffiths, Eldon Montgomery, Fergus Temple-Morris, Peter
Grist, Ian Moore, John (Croydon C) Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret
Grylls, Michael More, Jasper (Ludlow) Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon)
Hall, Sir John Morgan, Geraint Townsend, Cyril D.
Hall-Davis, A. G. F. Morgan-Giles, Rear-Admiral Trotter, Neville
Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury) Morris, Michael (Northampton S) Tugendhat, Christopher
Hampson Dr Keith Morrison, Charles (Devizes) van Straubenzee, W. R.
Hannam, John Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester) Vaughan, Dr Gerard
Mudd, David Viggers, Peter
Harrison, Col Sir Harwood (Eye) Nelson, Anthony Wakeham, John
Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss Neubert, Michael Walker-Smith, Rt Hon Sir Derek
Hastings, Stephen Newton, Tony Walters, Dennis
Havers, Sir Michael Normanton, Tom Warren, Kenneth
Hawkins, Paul Nott, John Weatherill, Bernard
Hayhoe Barney Onslow, Cranley Wells, John
Heseltine, Michael Oppenheim, Mrs Sally Whitelaw, Rt Hon William
Hicks, Robert Osborn, John Wiggin, Jerry
Higgins, Terence L. Page, John (Harrow West) Winterton, Nicholas
Holland, Philip Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby) Wood, Rt Hon Richard
Hooson, Emlyn Paisley, Rev Ian Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)
Hordern, Peter Parkinson, Cecil
Howe Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Pattie, Geoffrey TELLERS FOR THE AYES:
Howell, David (Guildford) Penhaligon, David Mr. Adam Butler and
Howell, Ralph (North Norfolk) Percival, Ian Mr. Fred Silvester.
NOES
Abse, Leo Atkins, Ronald (Preston N) Bidwell, Sydney
Allaun, Frank Bagier, Gordon A. T. Bishop, E. S.
Anderson, Donald Barnett, Guy (Greenwich) Blenkinsop, Arthur
Archer, Peter Barnett, Rt Hon Joel Boardman, H.
Armstrong, Ernest Bates, Alf Booth, Albert
Ashton, Joe Bennett, Andrew (Stockport N) Boothroyd, Miss Betty
Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur Hardy, Peter Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
Boyden, James (Bish Auck) Harper, Joseph Murray, Rt Hon Ronald King
Bradley, Tom Harrison, Walter (Wakefield) Newens, Stanley
Bray, Dr Jeremy Hart, Rt Hon Judith Noble, Mike
Brown, Hugh D. (Provan) Hatton, Frank Oakes, Gordon
Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W) Hayman, Mrs Helene Ogden, Eric
Brown, Ronald (Hackney S) Healey, Rt Hon Denis O'Halloran, Michael
Buchan, Norman Heffer, Eric S. O'Malley, Rt Hon Brian
Callaghan, Jim (Middleton & P) Hooley, Frank Orbach, Maurice
Campbell, Ian Horam, John Ovenden, John
Canavan, Dennis Howell, Denis (B'ham, Sm H) Owen, Dr David
Cant, R. B. Hoyle, Doug (Nelson) Padley, Walter
Carmichael, Neil Huckfield, Les Palmer, Arthur
Carter, Ray Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey) Park, George
Carter-Jones, Lewis Hughes, Mark (Durham) Parker, John
Castle, Rt Hon Barbara Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N) Parry, Robert
Clemitson, Ivor Hughes, Roy (Newport) Pavitt, Laurie
Cocks, Michael (Bristol S) Hunter, Adam Pendry, Tom
Cohen, Stanley Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford) Perry, Ernest
Coleman, Donald Jackson, Colin (Brighouse) Phipps, Dr Colin
Colquhoun, Mrs Maureen Jackson Miss Margaret (Lincoln) Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Concannon, J. D. Janner, Greville Prescott, John
Conlan, Bernard Jay, Rt Hon Douglas Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Cook, Robin F. (Ed'n C) Jeger, Mrs Lena Price, William (Rugby)
Corbett, Robin Jenkins, Hugh (Putney) Radice, Giles
Cox, Thomas (Tooting) Jenkins, Rt Hon Roy (Stechford) Richardson, Miss Jo
Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill) John Brynmor Roberts, Albert (Normanton)
Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Cryer, Bob Johnson, James (Hull West) Robertson, John (Paisley)
Cunningham, G. (Islington S) Johnson, Walter (Derby S) Roderick, Caerwyn
Cunningham, Dr. J. (Whiteh) Jones, Alec (Rhondda) Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Dalyell, Tam Jones, Barry (East Flint) Rodgers, William (Stockton)
Davidson, Arthur Jones, Dan (Burnley) Rooker, J. W.
Davies, Bryan (Enfield N) Judd, Frank Roper, John
Davies, Denzil (Llanelli) Kaufman, Gerald Rose, Paul B.
Davies, Ifor (Gower) Kelley Richard Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)
Davis, Clinton (Hackney C) Kerr, Russell Rowlands, Ted
Deakins, Eric Kilroy-Silk, Robert Ryman, John
Dean, Joseph (Leeds West) Kinnock, Neil Sandelson, Neville
de Freitas, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Lambie, David Sedgemore, Brian
Dell, Rt Hon Edmund Lamborn, Harry Selby, Harry
Dempsey, James Lamond, James Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)
Doig, Peter Latham, Arthur (Paddington) Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)
Douglas-Mann, Bruce Leadbitter, Ted Short, Rt Hon E. (Newcastle C)
Duffy, A. E. P. Lee, John Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)
Dunn, James A. Lewis, Ron (Carlisle) Silkin, Rt Hon S. C. (Dulwich)
Dunnett, Jack Lipton, Marcus Sillars, James
Dunwoody, Mrs Gwyneth Litterick, Tom Silverman, Julius
Eadie, Alex Loyden, Eddie Skinner, Dennis
Edelman, Maurice Luard, Evan Small, William
Edge, Geoff Lyon, Alexander (York) Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)
Edwards, Robert (Wolv SE) Lyons, Edward (Bradford W) Snape, Peter
Ellis, Tom (Wrexham) Mabon, Dr J. Dickson Spearing, Nigel
English, Michael McCartney, Hugh Spriggs, Leslie
Ennals, David MacFarquhar, Roderick Stallard, A. W.
Evans, Gwynfor (Carmarthen) McGuire, Michael (Ince) Stewart, Rt Hon M. (Fulham)
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare) Mackenzie, Gregor Stoddart, David
Evans, John (Newton) Mackintosh, John P. Stott, Roger
Ewing, Harry (Stirling) Maclennan, Robert Strang, Gavin
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E. McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C) Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.
Flannery, Martin McNamara, Kevin Swain, Thomas
Fletcher, Raymond (Ilkeston) Madden, Max Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)
Fletcher, Ted (Darlington) Magee, Bryan Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth)
Foot, Rt Hon Michael Marks, Kenneth Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)
Ford, Ben Marquand, David Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E)
Forrester, John Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole) Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW)
Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin) Marshall, Jim (Leicester S) Thorne, Stan (Preston South)
Fraser John (Lambeth, N'w'd) Mason, Rt Hon Roy Tierney, Sydney
Freeson, Reginald Meacher, Michael Tinn, James
Garrett, John (Norwich S) Mellish, Rt Hon Robert Tomlinson, John
Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend) Mikardo, Ian Torney, Tom
Gilbert Dr John Millan, Bruce Urwin, T. W.
Ginsburg, David Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride) Wainwright, Edwin (Dearne V)
Golding, John Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N) Walker, Harold (Doncaster)
Gould, Bryan Mitchell, R. C. (Soton, Itchen) Walker, Terry (Kingswood)
Gourlay, Harry Molloy, William Ward, Michael
Graham, Ted Moonman, Eric Watkins, David
Grant, John (Islington C) Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe) Watkinson, John
Grocott, Bruce Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw) Weitzman, David
Hamilton, James (Bothwell) Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon) Wellbeloved, James
Hamling, William Moyle, Roland White, Frank R. (Bury)
White, James (Pollok) Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford) Wrigglesworth, Ian
Whitehead, Phillip Williams, W. T. (Warringon) Young, David (Bolton E)
Whitlock, William Wilson, Rt Hon H. (Huyton)
Wigley, Dafydd Wilson, William (Coventry SE) TELLERS FOR THE NOES
Willey, Rt Hon Frederick Wise, Mrs Audrey Mr. J. D. Dormand and
Williams, Alan (Swansea W) Woodall, Alec Mr. John Ellis.

Question accordingly negatived.

Mr. Joel Barnett

I beg to move, That further consideration of the Bill, as amended, be now adjourned.

Sir G. Howe

That motion being moved at this time of night is quite unnecessary, extraordinary and intolerable. We have had a series of useful debates on important aspects of these early clauses. We have a number of further amendments down to Parts I, II and IV which have to be considered before we have to move on to consideration of Part III and the capital transfer tax.

In the light of what the Leader of the House said earlier it is plain that on no possible footing could we be ready to move to consideration of Part III before Wednesday. He told the House earlier today that there was available to hon. Members by that stage a full set of the amendments tabled to Part III. I rushed out with excitement to look for them, only to find the same rag-bag set of Xeroxed documents and nothing else, with no semblance of order about them—most of them, indeed, without numbers. It is quite wrong even for this Leader of the House to suggest that it would have been possible to move on to consideration of Part III during tomorrow.

In those circumstances, by the standards set by the Leader of the House himself, we would be able to take, as we should take, the rest of today and all of tomorrow to consider Parts I, II and IV. We are perfectly prepared, as we should be, to proceed tonight, through the night if necessary.

Quite apart from the provisions being debated on Part I, we shall be coming shortly to the attempt by the Government to reintroduce their changes in the level of investment income surcharge in Clause 5—an attempt which was rightly defeated last summer. They were not prepared to accept that as a defeat but are seeking yet again to introduce that provision, without considering the changes we suggested

There is no reason for these proceedings to be adjourned at this stage. We cannot understand what possible reason the Chief Secretary can have for this motion. If I may suggest a reason, however, it is that the Government themselves are so beset by their ignorance and lack of preparation of the amendments that they are seeking to make to Part III that they need all the time that they can get between now and dawn tomorrow, not to consider the amendments which we should now be moving but to make some kind of sense and order of the important proposals which they are still in course of tabling to Part III.

All this is a quite intolerable procedure. My hon. Friends are here, ready and willing to proceed to discussion of the amendments now on the paper. I suggest that we should have absolutely no use for the motion but should declare our willingness to proceed to further debate, through the night if necessary, on this Part of the Bill.

Mr. Ridley

It is very odd to find the Government moving a motion of this sort at this stage. It is normally the Opposition who move such a motion, and I commend my right hon. and hon. Friends for not having done so hitherto. During all the proceedings in Committee there was only one motion to adjourn the proceedings, although we had five all-night sittings. This is ample evidence of the Opposition's desire—nay, determination—to ensure that enough time is given to consideration of the Bill, without dilatory motions.

It is absolutely amazing that the Government should at this stage move a dilatory motion themselves. We have hardly started on consideration of the Bill, and already they seem to have no stomach for the fight. If necessary, we could provide camp beds as we did in Committee for Government supporters who do not feel able to withstand the all-night sittings which would be necessary to make progress with the Bill.

I very much want to get on to the capital transfer tax. I believe that with a little bit of a late night tonight and a normal sitting tomorrow we could deal with Parts I, II and IV easily by tomorrow night. That would leave us three days for consideration of the capital transfer tax.

11.30 p.m.

I have made only one short speech in the debate today so far, for the reason that I wanted to see the House make progress towards Part III. It would be only right and proper to give the Opposition the opportunity to continue the debate tonight so that we can dispense with another 10 or 12 amendments and then we could complete the earlier parts of the Bill by tomorrow night, leaving the House fresh and clear to start on the capital transfer tax on Wednesday.

If the motion is accepted by the House, that will not be possible. It means that the Opposition, having put themselves out, got their amendments tabled and accepted the extreme inconvenience of having to discuss amendments which are not properly tabled, which are not on the printed Order Paper and which they have not had time to consult about, are now to be stopped.

The Government's handling of the Bill has been one of the great parliamentary disgraces of the century. I hope that the Leader of the House, who apparently has been attending other functions, will not feel proud of his conduct of the Bill. I hope that the Chancellor of the Exchequer feels a bit ashamed of himself, because this is the first time he has listened to a debate on the Bill since he introduced Clause 17 a month ago and discovered that the private sector did not plant all the oaks and that one did not have to have a tenancy of one's mother-in-law if one asked her to live in one's house without it being charged as a chargeable transfer.

The Chancellor has never understood this tax. He has never taken any part in the proceedings on this tax, and it is to me quite revolting that the two right hon. Gentlemen come along to the House tonight to adjourn our proceedings at this stage when my right hon. and hon. Friends have been working through the day trying to improve the Bill, as we worked in Committee trying to improve it, and then, just because the two right hon. Gentlemen are tired and they think it is time to go to bed, they move a dilatory motion.

A dilatory motion is normally the weapon used by an Opposition, and I shall not say anything more on it now. I know that my hon. Friends will not listen to me, but I advise them all not to talk on this motion but to ask the Government to withdraw it so that we may make progress on the Bill, as we have always sought to do, and complete Parts I, II and IV by the end of tomorrow night, and then we can proceed in an orderly fashion to capital transfer tax. For the Government now, having mucked up their amendments and got their Bill badly drafted, to come and filibuster the Bill by moving a dilatory motion is the last straw.

Mr. Graham Page

This is the most extraordinary motion for the Government to bring forward at this time of the evening. We had 135 hours in Committee, and not one debate was closured in Committee. We were constructive in Committee. We have been constructive today. Nobody could say that the last motion was filibustering. I moved it in about three minutes. We had a short reply from the Financial Secretary and then we divided. We want to get on with the Bill. Apparently the Government do not.

Will the Chief Secretary, the Leader of the House or the Chancellor of the Exchequer come clean with the House? What is the plan behind this? Is it intended that we should spend a very long time on Parts I, II and IV so that we do not reach the capital transfer tax, which we want to debate, or is the plan in some way to curtail us by a guillotine? May we be told?

Mr. Gow

Is it not disgraceful for the Chief Secretary to put a motion of this kind to the House at such a very early hour of the evening without giving the House any explanation of the reason why he is moving it?

Ought not either the Chief Secretary or the Leader of the House to tell us plainly why the Chief Secretary is moving the motion tonight? Why is there no explanation why the motion has been moved? Why is it that after the Chief Secretary himself complained about the three-hour debate earlier today he is now saying that there should be no further debate this evening? The Opposition are very happy to go on debating this all through the night, and we regard it as typical of the contempt and arrogance with which the Government Front Bench treats the House that it should seek to curtail our debate without any explanation.

Will the Chief Secretary tell the House exactly what he has in mind for the future timetable for debating the Report stage of the Bill? Will he tell us clearly, and without equivocation?

Mr. John Peyton (Yeovil)

rose

Mr. Ted Leadbitter (Hartlepool)

The man with 11 votes.

Mr. Peyton

The hon. Member for Hartlepool (Mr. Leadbitter) has always been very good at humour. I have all the time in the world, and if he can find anybody to laugh at him tonight he will be lucky.

I want to recapitulate. The Leader of the House—we are glad to see him tonight; obviously he is surprised to find himself here—promised us five days' debate on Report. Subsequently a legion of amendments were put down by the Government as well as by my right hon. and hon. Friends. They were published only a few days ago—some of them were published only today—without any adequate time either for people in this House to consider them or—the Leader of the House has persistently ignored this—for many people outside the House who are interest—[HON. MEMBERS: "Oh."] Why jeer at that? Many people outside the House who live in this country are under the mistaken impression that they have some rights which will be respected by the House of Commons and the Government. They have still to learn the bitter lesson that they are wrong, and that under this Government they have very few rights.

The concern of my right hon. and hon. Friends is that no adequate time has been given, first, to consider the ill-conceived proposals of the Government and, secondly, to give mature consideration to amendments proposed in considerable haste and in respect of which there is no ground for confidence that they are well-founded. After a few hours of the Report stage promised by the Government, they suddenly move this motion, with an apparent air of disappointment. Anyone would think, reflecting upon the way it is done, that they have endured too many hours of discussion on the Report stage. But not at all. The answer, of course, is under a very thin gossamer veil. Here is the horror. The fact is that the Leader of the House and his right hon. Friends have already put into the Table Office a Finance Bill (Allocation of Time) Motion.

The right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary, if he had sought to be candid with the House—which of course he did not—in the course of moving the motion, might have told the House what the Government's intention was. But he did not. He sought to conceal it.

Mr. Joel Barnett

indicated dissent.

Mr. Peyton

It would be hard for us to believe that the right hon. Gentleman had been kept in the dark by his colleagues as to the existence of this new motion. Although we know that he is not aware of a great deal, we nevertheless are prepared to credit him with knowledge of his colleagues' intentions.

Now I turn to the very disagreeable subject of the right hon. Gentleman the Leader of the House.

Mr. Ted Graham (Edmonton)

Make it short.

Mr. Peyton

I wish I could. I must tell the Leader of the House, from whom is always expected some show of responsibility and concern for the rights of the House as a whole, that when he achieved the high position that he now has, very few of my right hon. or hon. Friends had a lot of confidence but we hoped for the best. In the face of this shabby and ill-conceived manoeuvre, we have none at all. We believe that he has manifested not only his own character but his own total contempt for the House of Commons and his utter lack of concern for those who do not agree with him and who do not endorse his rather unpleasant views. [Interruption.] If the Leader of the House wishes to interrupt me, I shall gladly give way. But I must tell him now—and I speak for everyone on the Opposition side of the House—[HON. MEMBERS: "No."]—that we have no confidence in his judgment and less in his good faith.

11.45 p.m.

Mr. Goodhew

rose

The Parliamentary Secretary to the Treasury (Mr. Robert Mellish)

Why did you not—[Interruption.]

Mr. Deputy Speaker (Mr. Oscar Murton)

It would be appropriate if the House attempted to conduct itself more peaceably.

Mr. Goodhew

The Government Front Bench is treating the House with considerable contempt. We are entitled to an explanation from somebody on the Treasury Bench in support of the motion. [Interruption.] We do not need an explanation by the comrade from Bolsover.

Only last Thursday we heard from the Leader of the House how anxious he was to get his business through by 14th March. Now, although we have been discussing these matters for only a short while, the Chief Secretary has moved a motion without a word of explanation. Perhaps the Chief Secretary is embarrassed by this situation. I should not be in the least surprised if he were embarrassed, although he shakes his head in denial. However, even if he is embarrassed, the House is entitled to a statement from the Leader of the House.

In my 15 years in the House I cannot remember a Leader of the House who treated the House with such contempt as this one has. He has been thoroughly unsympathetic to the interests of back benchers. Instead of coming here tonight wearing his black tie and yawning his head off, as he has for the past few minutes, he should have sought to explain—[Interruption.] It is no good hon. Members opposite waving at me and threatening me. I have no anxiety to prolong these proceedings. I think that the proceedings arise in a disgraceful way. If hon. Members continue to make such signals at me, I shall treat them with the contempt they deserve. Let them wave at their floosies but not at me.

I hope that the Leader of the House, having behaved as he has over the past week, will now have the good grace to explain to back benchers on both sides what he is up to.

Mr. Deputy-Speaker (Mr. Oscar Murton)

The Question is, That further consideration of the Bill, as amended, be now adjourned.

Sir G. Howe

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Since the Question has not been put—

Mr. Deputy Speaker

Order. The Question has been put.

Sir G. Howe

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. How can you say that the Question has been put when you have not collected the voices from either side of the House? Neither side of the House has been able to assert either "Aye" or "No".

Mr. Deputy Speaker

As there appears to be some belief that the voices were not collected, I shall put the Question again.

Hon. Members

No.

Sir G. Howe

For this Question to be the subject of a vote when we have not heard one word of explanation from the Government and when a number of my right hon. and hon. Friends have put question after question—

Mr. Deputy Speaker

Order. Is the right hon. and learned Gentleman addressing the Chair on a point of order?

Sir G. Howe

Yes, Mr. Deputy Speaker. My first point of order is that hon. Members should be invited to resume their seats. My second point is that although the right hon. Gentleman the Chief Secretary moved the motion with unusual brevity for him—

Mr. Deputy Speaker

Order. It is impossible for the Chair to hear the point of order if other hon. Members are speaking.

Sir G. Howe

The motion has been moved. It is before the House, not as a result of any action by the Leader of the House or the Government, but because the Government have tabled a timetable motion—in short, a guillotine motion. They have made manifest the reasons why they are seeking to move the motion for further consideration. When are the Government going to come clean with the House and say something about the time table motion?

Mr. Deputy Speaker

There appears still to be a misunderstanding. I have put the Question—

Hon. Members

No.

Mr. Deputy Speaker

I was in the process of putting the Question, and that is what I intend now to do.

Several Hon. Members

rose

Sir G. Howe

The point I am raising is this, Mr. Deputy Speaker. The Question ought not to be put until we have heard a word of explanation from the Leader of the House.

Mr. Deputy Speaker

The right hon. and learned Gentleman may address the Chair at this stage only on a point of order.

Mr. Peyton

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. The only reason you get so far in the process of putting the Question was that my hon. and right hon. Friends were waiting in the confidence, albeit with a misplaced confidence, that the Minister would attempt to justify what we regard as gross misconduct. We all have great sympathy with you, Mr. Deputy Speaker, in your difficult position, but we very much hope that you will allow every opportunity for a Minister to put the Government's point of view, or alternatively, allow the debate on this motion to continue uninterrupted.

Hon. Hembers

Answer.

Mr. Edward Short

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. I would certainly hope to make a statement on the Adjournment when this motion has been carried.

Hon. Members

No.

Sir G. Howe

Further to the point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. If a timetable motion has been placed before the House, ought we not to have an announcement to that effect before the Adjournment motion is moved?

Mr. Thorpe

rose

Mr. Deputy Speaker

Order. I wish to reply to the earlier point of order.

Mr. Thorpe

rose

Mr. Deputy Speaker

The question was asked whether the Leader of the House would make a statement. He has made that statement. [HON. MEMBERS: "No."] He has promised that he will make that statement after this motion has been dealt with.

Mr. Thorpe

On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. The Leader of the House has said that we must vote first and then he will give his reasons afterwards.

Mr. Norman Tebbit (Chingford)

Further to the point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. [HON. MEMBERS: "Sit down."] When the House has managed to calm down a little and when Labour Members realise that this is the House of Commons and not the Reichstag—[HON. MEMBERS: "Rubbish."]—perhaps we may make a little progress. How are hon. Members expected to understand the issues on which they are to vote when the Leader of the House says that he will not make a statement or an announcement or give any indication of what is involved until after the vote has been taken? Surely that is a total and complete disregard of the House. [HON. MEMBERS: "Shut up."] Mr. Deputy Speaker, you did not put the Question.

12 midnight.

Mr. Deputy Speaker

May I try to assist the House in this difficult matter. When I put the Question, I did not finish the proper procedure by saying "The Ayes have it". That is where the mistake arose.

Mr. Peyton

One point which the Leader of the House made absolutely clear was that it was his intention, in a matter as contentious as this, to absorb the time of a back-bench Member on the Adjournment in order to explain, if it is explainable, the tortuous course adopted by the Government. I say with great respect that there is a duty upon the Chair to protect the rights of backbenchers against the depredations of Ministers who take up their time in order to explain, at a time when there may be only minutes available.

Mr. Deputy Speaker

That is not a matter for the Chair.

Sir John Eden (Bournemouth, West)

You have very helpfully given an explanation of what went wrong when you put the Question, Mr. Deputy Speaker. You said that the Leader of the House had made a statement, at the request of my hon. Friends and others. It is within the recollection of all my hon. Friends that the right hon. Gentleman said that he would say something later. I do not know whether that, in your judgment, fairly constitutes a statement, but you clearly had a view that the right hon. Gentleman had made his commitment to the House as a whole. I am not clear what it is that the right hon. Gentleman will give an explanation about.

Mr. Deputy Speaker

That will become apparent when the time comes.

Several Hon. Members

rose

Mr. Deputy Speaker

Order. I wish to make it quite clear that when I put the Question but failed to collect the voices there was no hon. Member on his feet. That is where the misunderstanding lay. I now propose to put the Question.

Hon. Members

No.

Question put:

The House proceeded to a Division

Mr. Peter Emery (Honiton)

(seated and covered): On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. May I ask you how, after you had, in your own words, started to put the Question, you then relented and allowed the Leader of the House, not rising on a point of order, to speak to the House?

Mr. Deputy Speaker (Mr. Oscar Murton)

Perhaps I can help the hon. Gentleman. The Chair had assumed that the Leader of the House was rising on a point of order.

Mr. Emery

(seated and covered): Further to that point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. How is it for the Chair to presume, when the Leader of the House, who knows about the procedures of this House, rises—not on a point of order—that the right hon. Gentleman is rising on a point of order? The right hon. Gentleman has not done so and I suggest that the debate ought to be continued—

Mr. Deputy Speaker

Order. I have put the Question.

Mrs. Winifred Ewing (Moray and Nairn)

(seated and covered): On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker—

Mr. Emery

(seated and covered) I was in the middle of a point of order to which I have not had an answer. How can it be correct—

Mr. Deputy Speaker

I gave the hon. Gentleman an answer. I believed that the Leader of the House was rising on a point of order.

Mr. Emery

(seated and covered): Further to that point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. How can it be, when the Leader of the House—the holder of the rules of order—does not rise on a point of order, that the Chair presumes that that is what he is doing? If the Leader of the House makes a mistake we, the minority, have a right to your protection.

Mr. Deputy Speaker

The answer was, as I said previously, that there was no right hon. or hon. Member on his feet at the time when I originally put the Question.

Mrs. Winifred Ewing

(seated and covered): On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. My point of order is simple. I am a Member of this House and I could not hear what was happening. I could not hear even by listening to the microphones in the seat. I do not think it is right for these proceedings to commence at all. My group could not hear what was happening. We do not know what is happening because of the noise in the Chamber, because there was no order being kept. That is my point of order. I would like to hear an answer.

Mr. Deputy Speaker

The microphones must not be strong enough for the hon. Lady.

Mrs. Winifred Ewing

(seated and covered): That is a very bad answer.

Mr. Michael Spicer (Worcestershire, South)

(seated and covered): On a point of order, Mr. Deputy Speaker. Does this extraordinary announcement by the Leader of the House mean that my Adjournment debate, on behalf of my constituents, will be lost?

Mr. Deputy Speaker

No. Not in any way.

The House having divided: Ayes 269, Noes 257.

Division No. 118.] AYES [12.5 a.m.
Abse, Leo Fletcher, Ted (Darlington) Marquand, David
Allaun, Frank Foot, Rt Hon Michael Marshall, Dr Edmund (Goole)
Anderson, Donald Ford, Ben Marshall, Jim (Leicester S)
Archer, Peter Forrester, John Mason, Rt Hon Roy
Armstrong, Ernest Fowler, Gerald (The Wrekin) Meacher, Michael
Ashton, Joe Fraser John (Lambeth, N'w'd) Mellish, Rt Hon Robert
Atkins, Ronald (Preston N) Freeson, Reginald Mikardo, Ian
Atkinson, Norman Garrett, John (Norwich S) Millan, Bruce
Bagier, Gordon A. T. Garrett, W. E. (Wallsend) Miller, Dr M. S. (E Kilbride)
Barnett, Guy (Greenwich) Gilbert Dr John Miller, Mrs Millie (Ilford N)
Barnett, Rt Hon Joel Ginsburg, David Mitchell, R. C. (Soton, Itchen)
Bates, Alf Golding, John Molloy, William
Bennett, Andrew (Stockport N) Gould, Bryan Moonman, Eric
Bidwell, Sydney Gourlay, Harry Morris, Alfred (Wythenshawe)
Bishop, E. S. Graham, Ted Morris, Charles R. (Openshaw)
Blenkinsop, Arthur Grant, John (Islington C) Morris, Rt Hon J. (Aberavon)
Boardman, H. Grocott, Bruce Moyle, Roland
Booth, Albert Hamilton, James (Bothwell) Mulley, Rt Hon Frederick
Boothroyd, Miss Betty Hamling, William Murray, Rt Hon Ronald King
Bottomley, Rt Hon Arthur Hardy, Peter Newens, Stanley
Boyden, James (Bish Auck) Harper, Joseph Noble, Mike
Bradley, Tom Harrison, Walter (Wakefield) Oakes, Gordon
Bray, Dr Jeremy Hart, Rt Hon Judith Ogden, Eric
Brown, Hugh D. (Provan) Hatton, Frank O'Halloran, Michael
Brown, Robert C. (Newcastle W) Hayman, Mrs Helene O'Malley, Rt Hon Brian
Brown, Ronald (Hackney S) Healey, Rt Hon Denis Orbach, Maurice
Buchan, Norman Heffer, Eric S. Ovenden, John
Callaghan, Jim (Middleton & P) Hooley, Frank Owen, Dr David
Campbell, Ian Horam, John Palmer, Arthur
Canavan, Dennis Howell, Denis (B'ham, Sm H) Park, George
Cant, R. B. Hoyle, Doug (Nelson) Parker, John
Carmichael, Neil Huckfield, Les Parry, Robert
Carter, Ray Hughes, Rt Hon C. (Anglesey) Pavitt, Laurie
Carter-Jones, Lewis Hughes, Mark (Durham) Pendry, Tom
Castle, Rt Hon Barbara Hughes, Robert (Aberdeen N) Perry, Ernest
Clemitson, Ivor Hughes, Roy (Newport) Phipps, Dr Colin
Cocks, Michael (Bristol S) Hunter, Adam Prentice, Rt Hon Reg
Cohen, Stanley Irving, Rt Hon S. (Dartford) Prescott, John
Coleman, Donald Jackson, Colin (Brighouse) Price, C. (Lewisham W)
Colquhoun, Mrs Maureen Jackson Miss Margaret (Lincoln) Price, William (Rugby)
Concannon, J. D. Janner, Greville Radice, Giles
Conlan, Bernard Jeger, Mrs Lena Richardson, Miss Jo
Cook, Robin F. (Edin C) Jenkins, Hugh (Putney) Roberts, Albert (Normanton)
Corbett, Robin John Brynmor Roberts, Gwilym (Cannock)
Cox, Thomas (Tooting) Johnson, James (Hull West) Robertson, John (Paisley)
Craigen, J. M. (Maryhill) Jones, Alec (Rhondda) Roderick, Caerwyn
Crosland, Rt Hon Anthony Jones, Barry (East Flint) Rodgers, George (Chorley)
Cryer, Bob Jones, Dan (Burnley) Rodgers, William (Stockton)
Cunningham, G. (Islington S) Judd, Frank Rooker, J. W.
Cunningham, Dr J. (Witeh) Kaufman, Gerald Roper, John
Dalyell, Tam Kelley Richard Rose, Paul B.
Davidson, Arthur Kerr, Russell Ross, Rt Hon W. (Kilmarnock)
Davies, Bryan (Enfield N) Kilroy-Silk, Robert Rowlands, Ted
Davies, Denzil (Llanelli) Kinnock, Neil Ryman, John
Davies, Ifor (Gower) Lambie, David Sandelson, Neville
Davis, Clinton (Hackney C) Lamborn, Harry Sedgemore, Brian
Deakins, Eric Lamond, James Selby, Harry
Dean, Joseph (Leeds West) Latham, Arthur (Paddington) Shaw, Arnold (Ilford South)
de Freitas, Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Leadbitter, Ted Sheldon, Robert (Ashton-u-Lyne)
Dell, Rt Hon Edmund Lee, John Short, Rt Hon E. (Newcastle C)
Dempsey, James Lewis, Ron (Carlisle) Silkin, Rt Hon John (Deptford)
Doig, Peter Lipton, Marcus Silkin, Rt Hon S. C. (Dulwich)
Dormand, J. D. Litterick, Tom Sillars, James
Douglas-Mann, Bruce Loyden, Eddie Silverman, Julius
Duffy, A. E. P. Luard, Evan Skinner, Dennis
Dunnett, Jack Lyon, Alexander (York) Small, William
Dunwoody, Mrs Gwyneth Lyons, Edward (Bradford W) Smith, John (N Lanarkshire)
Eadie, Alex Mabon, Dr J. Dickson Snape, Peter
Edelman, Maurice McCartney, Hugh Spearing, Nigel
Edge, Geoff MacFarquhar, Roderick Spriggs, Leslie
Ellis, Tom (Wrexham) McGuire, Michael (Ince) Stallard, A. W.
English, Michael Mackenzie, Gregor Stewart, Rt Hon M. (Fulham)
Ennals, David Mackintosh, John P. Stoddart, David
Evans, Ioan (Aberdare) Maclennan, Robert Stott, Roger
Evans, John (Newton) McMillan, Tom (Glasgow C) Strang, Gavin
Ewing, Harry (Stirling) McNamara, Kevin Strauss, Rt Hon G. R.
Fernyhough, Rt Hon E. Madden, Max Swain, Thomas
Flannery, Martin Magee, Bryan Taylor, Mrs Ann (Bolton W)
Fletcher, Raymond (Ilkeston) Marks, Kenneth Thomas, Jeffrey (Abertillery)
Thomas, Mike (Newcastle E) Ward, Michael Williams, W. T. (Warringon)
Thomas, Ron (Bristol NW) Watkins, David Wilson, Alexander (Hamilton)
Thorne, Stan (Preston South) Watkinson, John Wilson, Rt Hon H. (Huyton)
Tierney, Sydney Weitzman, David Wilson, William (Coventry SE)
Tinn, James Wellbeloved, James Wise, Mrs Audrey
Tomlinson, John White, Frank R. (Bury) Woodall, Alec
Torney, Tom White, James (Pollok) Wrigglesworth, Ian
Urwin, T. W. Whitehead, Phillip Young, David (Bolton E)
Wainwright, Edwin (Dearne V) Whitlock, William
Walden, Brian (B'ham, L'dyw'd) Willey, Rt Hon Frederick TELLERS FOR THE AYES:
Walker, Harold (Doncaster) Williams, Alan (Swansea W) Mr. James A. Dunn and
Walker, Terry (Kingswood) Williams, Rt Hon Shirley (Hertford) Mr. John Ellis.
NOES
Adley, Robert Gilmour, Rt Hon Ian (Chesham) McNair-Wilson, M. (Newbury)
Aitken, Jonathan Gilmour, Sir John (East Fife) Madel, David
Alison, Michael Glyn, Dr Alan Marshall, Michael (Arundel)
Awdry, Daniel Goodhew, Victor Marten, Neil
Bain, Mrs Margaret Goodlad, Alastair Mather, Carol
Baker, Kenneth Gorst, John Maude, Angus
Banks, Robert Gow, Ian (Eastbourne) Maudling, Rt Hon Reginald
Beith, A. J. Gower Sir Raymond (Barry) Mawby, Ray
Bennett, Dr Reginald (Fareham) Grant, Anthony (Harrow C) Maxwell-Hyslop, Robin
Benyon, W. Gray, Hamish Mayhew, Patrick
Berry, Hon Anthony Grieve, Percy Meyer, Sir Anthony
Biffen, John Griffiths, Eldon Mills, Peter
Biggs-Davison, John Grist, Ian Miscampbell, Norman
Blaker, Peter Grylls, Michael Mitchell, David (Basingstoke)
Bowden, A. (Brighton, Kemptown) Hall, Sir John Moate, Roger
Boyson, Dr Rhodes (Brent) Hall-Davis, A. G. F. Molyneaux, James
Braine, Sir Bernard Hamilton, Michael (Salisbury) Monro, Hector
Brittan, Leon Hampson, Dr Keith Montgomery, Fergus
Brotherton, Michael Hannam, John Moore, John (Croydon C)
Brown, Sir Edward (Bath) Harrison, Col Sir Harwood (Eye) More, Jasper (Ludlow)
Bryan, Sir Paul Harvie Anderson, Rt Hon Miss Morgan, Geraint
Buchanan-Smith, Alick Hastings, Stephen Morgan-Giles, Rear-Admiral
Buck, Antony Havers, Sir Michael Morris, Michael (Northampton S)
Budgen, Nick Hawkins, Paul Morrison, Charles (Devizes)
Bulmer, Esmond Hayhoe Barney Morrison, Hon Peter (Chester)
Carlisle, Mark Henderson Douglas Mudd, David
Chalker, Mrs Lynda Heseltine, Michael Nelson, Anthony
Channon, Paul Hicks, Robert Neubert, Michael
Churchill, W. S. Higgins, Terence L. Newton, Tony
Clark, Alan (Plymouth, Sutton) Holland, Philip Normanton, Tom
Clark, William (Croydon S) Hooson, Emlyn Nott, John
Clarke, Kenneth (Rushcliffe) Hordern, Peter Onslow, Cranley
Clegg, Walter Howe Rt Hon Sir Geoffrey Oppenheim, Mrs Sally
Cockcroft, John Howell, David (Guildford) Osborn, John
Cooke, Robert (Bristol W) Howell, Ralph (North Norfolk) Page, John (Harrow West)
Cope, John Howells, Geraint (Cardigan) Page, Rt Hon R. Graham (Crosby)
Cormack, Patrick Hurd, Douglas Paisley, Rev Ian
Corrie, John James, David Parkinson, Cecil
Costain, A. P. Jenkin, Rt Hon P. (Wanst'd & W'df'd) Pattie, Geoffrey
Craig, Rt Hon W. (Belfast E) Jessel, Toby Penhaligon, David
Crawford, Douglas Johnson Smith, G. (E Grinstead) Percival, Ian
Crouch, David Jones Arthur (Daventry) Peyton, Rt Hon John
Crowder, F. P. Jopling, Michael Pink, R. Bonner
Davies, Rt Hon J. (Knutsford) Joseph, Rt Hon Sir Keith Powell, Rt Hon J. Enoch
Dean, Paul (N Somerset) Kaberry, Sir Donald Pym, Rt Hon Francis
Dodsworth, Geoffrey Kellett-Bowman, Mrs Elaine Rathbone, Tim
Douglas-Hamilton, Lord James Kershaw, Anthony Rawlinson, Rt Hon Sir Peter
du Cann, Rt Hon Edward Kimball, Marcus Rees, Peter (Dover & Deal)
Durant, Tony King, Evelyn (South Dorset) Rees-Davies, W. R.
Eden, Rt Hon Sir John King, Tom (Bridgwater) Renton, Rt Hon Sir D. (Hunts)
Edwards, Nicholas (Pembroke) Kirk, Peter Renton, Tim (Mid-Sussex)
Elliott, Sir William Kitson, Sir Timothy Rhys Williams, Sir Brandon
Emery, Peter Knight, Mrs Jill Ridley, Hon Nicholas
Ewing, Mrs Winifred (Moray) Lamont, Norman Ridsdale, Julian
Eyre, Reginald Lane, David Rifkind, Malcolm
Fairbairn, Nicholas Langford-Holt, Sir John Rippon, Rt Hon Geoffrey
Fairgrieve, Russell Latham, Michael (Melton) Roberts, Michael (Cardiff NW)
Fell, Anthony Lawrence, Ivan Roberts, Wyn (Conway)
Finsberg Geoffrey Lawson, Nigel Ross, Stephen (Isle of Wight)
Fisher, Sir Nigel Lester, Jim (Beeston) Ross, William (Londonderry)
Fletcher, Alex (Edinburgh N) Lewis, Kenneth (Rutland) Rossi, Hugh (Hornsey)
Fletcher-Cooke, Charles Loveridge, John Rost, Peter (SE Derbyshire)
Fowler Norman (Sutton C'f'd) Luce, Richard Sainsbury, Tim
Fox, Marcus MacCormick, Iain St. John-Stevas, Norman
Fraser, Rt Hon H. (Stafford & St) McCrindle, Robert Scott, Nicholas
Fry, Peter McCusker, H. Scott-Hopkins, James
Galbraith, Hon. T. G. D. Macfarlane, Neil Shaw, Giles (Pudsey)
Gardiner, George (Reigate) MacGregor, John Shaw, Michael (Scarborough)
Gardner, Edward (S Fylde) Macmillan, Rt Hon M. (Farnham) Shelton, William (Streatham)
Shepherd, Colin Stewart, Ian (Hitchin) Walker-Smith, Rt Hon Sir Derek
Shersby, Michael Stokes, John Walters, Dennis
Silvester, Fred Stradling Thomas, J. Warren, Kenneth
Sims, Roger Taylor, R. (Croydon NW) Watt, Hamish
Sinclair, Sir George Taylor, Teddy (Cathcart) Weatherill, Bernard
Skeet, T. H. H. Tebbit, Norman Wells, John
Smith, Cyril (Rochdale) Temple-Morris, Peter Welsh, Andrew
Smith, Dudley (Warwick) Thatcher, Rt Hon Margaret Whitelaw, Rt Hon William
Speed, Keith Thomas, Dafydd (Merioneth) Wiggin, Jerry
Spence, John Thompson, George Wigley, Dafydd
Spicer, Jim (W Dorset) Thorpe, Rt Hon Jeremy (N Devon) Wilson, Gordon (Dundee E)
Spicer, Michael (S Worcester) Townsend, Cyril D. Winterton, Nicholas
Sproat, Iain Trotter, Neville Wood, Rt Hon Richard
Stanbrook, Ivor Tugendhat, Christopher Young, Sir G. (Ealing, Acton)
Stanley, John van Straubenzee, W. R.
Steel, David (Roxburgh) Vaughan, Dr Gerard TELLERS FOR THE NOES:
Steen, Anthony (Wavertree) Viggers, Peter Mr. Spencer Le Marchant and
Stewart, Donald (Western Isles) Wakeham, John Mr. Adam Butler.

Question accordingly agreed to.

Resolved, That further consideration of the Bill, as amended, be now adjourned.

Bill, not amended in the Committee and as amended in the Standing Committee, to be further considered this day.

Back to