§ 18. Mr. GWYNNEasked the Secretary of State for the Home Department whether Michael Roche, who was convicted, in January last, of a serious crime against military disciplne and sentenced to six months' imprisonment, was released in April; and, if so, whether those responsible for the discipline of the Army were first consulted, and did they approve?
§ The SECRETARY of STATE for the HOME DEPARTMENT (Mr. Shortt)When it was decided to release the other men who were convicted with Roche, his case was also considered, and it was thought right to remit the remainder of his sentence. Roche was convicted by a civil court of larceny, and no question of military discipline arose.
§ Mr. GWYNNECan the right hon. Gentleman reply to the last part of my question, as to whether those responsible for the discipline of the Army were first consulted?
§ Mr. SHORTTThis was a civil case.
§ Mr. GWYNNEWill the right hon. Gentleman say who gave orders for the release of this man, as well as the two Irish prisoners convicted of stealing the guns? Was it the Cabinet, or the right hon. Gentleman himself as Home Secretary?
§ Mr. SHORTTIt was part of the general policy.
§ Mr. SHARMAN-CRAWFORDCan the right hon. Gentleman say if this non-commissioned officer has been reinstated in his regiment?
§ Mr. SHORTTI should think not, but I do not know.