HC Deb 21 June 1921 vol 143 cc1075-6
31. Sir J. BUTCHER

asked the Home Secretary whether his attention has been called to the judgment of Lord Justice Banks in the recent case of Remmington v. Larchin in which he says that there is no section of the Increase of Rent and Mortgage Interest (Restrictions) Act, 1920, which does not create difficulty: whether he is aware that in the opinion of the most experienced county court judges the Act requires considerable amendment; and whether, in view of these expressions of authoritative opinion, he will appoint a Select Committee to inquire into the working of the Act and to make recommendations for its amendment?

Sir A. MOND

I have been asked to reply. My hon. and learned Friend will recollect that the Act of last year was based upon the recommendations of a Committee presided over by Lord Salisbury and including one of the most experienced county court judges among its members. I should doubt whether anything would be gained by the appointment of another committee at the present time.

Sir J. BUTCHER

Has the right hon. Gentleman any information as to the views of county court judges on the question? Can he answer the first part of my question?

Sir A. MOND

My attention has not been called to this judgment and I have not had time to look at it.

Sir J. BUTCHER

Will the right hon. Gentleman look at it, and reconsider the matter in the light of that judgment?

Sir A. MOND

I will certainly look it up.