HC Deb 23 November 1920 vol 135 cc205-6
65. Sir H. BRITTAIN

asked the Postmaster-General whether he can give the House the name of the official responsible for the admitted blunder in printing the index letters in the telephone book close to the binding instead of at the head of the outside columns, and thereby causing the public the greatest inconvenience?

Mr. ILLINGWORTH

The current Telephone Directory is the first to be issued under new printing arrangements, and the error in question is the result of a misunderstanding between the Post Office and the printers. I do not think any useful purpose would be served by pursuing the subject further.

Sir H. BRITTAIN

With all deference, may I ask my right hon. Friend whether he does not consider that a somewhat poor excuse? Surely the Post Office possesses officials of some kind to revise work that comes from the printers, before it is passed?

Mr. ILLINGWORTH

A mistake has been made, and all I can say is that it is not a Post Office official who is responsible.

Sir H. BRITTAIN

Will the right hon. Gentleman consider whether the Post Office cannot change its printers?

Sir W. DAVISON

Is there no official who is responsible for supervising documents before they are issued to the public?

Mr. MOLES

Is it not a fact that this issue was made by a State-owned printing office.

Sir W. DAVISON

May I have a reply to my question?

Mr. ILLINGWORTH

They are supervised as a rule, certainly, but in this case I do not think the book was supervised after it was bound.

Sir H. BRITTAIN

I shall put this question again in a week's time.