HC Deb 14 March 1912 vol 35 cc1341-5

Order read for resuming Adjourned Debate on Question [13th March] "That this House doth agree with the Committee in the Resolution, 'That a Supplementary sum, not exceeding £47,000, be granted to His Majesty, to defray the Charge which will come in course of payment during the year ending on the 31st day of March, 1912, for Stationery, Printing, Paper, Binding, and Printed Books for the Public Service; for the Salaries and Expenses of the Stationery Office; and for sundry Miscel- laneous Services, including Reports of Parliamentary Debates.'"

Question again proposed. Debate resumed.

Mr. ASHLEY

I do not wish to detain the House, but there is a point—

Mr. SPEAKER

The hon. Member for Yarmouth is in possession of the House, as he was speaking when the Debate stood adjourned last night.

Mr. FELL

I was, at the moment, drawing my remarks to a conclusion. All I desired to do was to call attention to the fact that the Government, when framing their Estimates, might have foreseen that the Session would be prolonged, and might have made provision accordingly.

Mr. ASHLEY

I think we are entitled to some answer to the very cogent argument put forward by my hon. Friend (Mr. Mitchell-Thomson) in the Debate yesterday as to Item N (Parliamentary Debates and Records). The answer given by the Secretary to the Treasury was not satisfactory. My hon. Friend pointed out that the cost for printing the Reports in the Summer Session was 7s. 6d. per column, whereas for the Autumn Session it was 12s. 6d. Although it is quite true that the reporting of Part II. of the Insurance Bill might reduce the cost by 1s. a column, yet, on the most liberal allowance, them is 4s. per column extra for reporting during the Autumn Session than for the Summer Session. What is the reason for this difference?

Sir GEORGE TOULMIN

I happen to have a little information about this matter. It is really the simplest Rule of Three sum. The average number of pages per day during last Session was eighty. That is not merely for the Autumn Session, but the average for the whole year. The House sat for 170 days, instead of 120. Seven times twelve is 84, and eight times 170 is 1,360. As 84 is to 136, so is £7,000 to £12,000. It is really an identical sum per page that is charged for the whole year. The estimate was an under-estimate, very largely owing to the large number of questions that were asked through- out the year, which increased the total number of pages. There is no particular extra cost involved as regards printing.

Lord HUGH CECIL

I quite follow the sum of the hon. Gentleman, but, as I understand it, the only reason why there was more charged in the Autumn Session than in the Summer Session was because more pages of the OFFICIAL REPORT were recited.

Sir G. TOULMIN

I am sorry I have not made myself understood. The charge per page is identical. The extra sum is not for the Autumn Session, it is for the whole year, the average number of pages in each part for the whole year being seventy-nine, as compared with sixty-nine, so that the whole sum is not simply for the Autumn Session, but for a greater length in all the Session than had been estimated.

Lord HUGH CECIL

I am sure the House is indebted to the hon. Member for his lucid explanation, but it seems that someone has made a rather serious blunder in estimating the cost per page at less than it actually turned out to be. The hon. Member now explains that the cost per page was greater than was anticipated.

Sir G. TOULMIN

No, there were more pages at the same cost per page.

Lord HUGH CECIL

The estimate was that the House would not talk so much as actually occurred. The Government anticipated a shorter Session than actually took place, and what we are now required to vote is the cost naturally arising for any additional cost per page, because the Session was prolonged. In one way it throws an interesting light on the calculations of the Government at the beginning of the Session. We get for a moment behind the minds of the Cabinet early in January, and see that they did not anticipate a National Insurance Bill, or, at any rate, an Autumn Session on that subject. I think the explanation is a very satisfactory one, but I cannot conceive why it was not given by the Financial Secretary to the Treasury.

The FINANCIAL SECRETARY to the TREASURY (Mr. Masterman)

It was given last night.

Lord HUGH CECIL

With the same arithmetical precision?

Mr. MASTERMAN

Yes.

Lord HUGH CECIL

We are obliged to the hon. Member (Sir G. Toulmin) for having explained the matter, and I hope he will soon occupy an official position, in which he will be able to give lucid explanations with more authority and equal precision.

Mr. JAMES HOPE

I do not know whether it would be entirely in order to ask the Secretary to the Treasury whether he has framed his Estimates on this particular subject for this year?

Mr. SPEAKER

We are not dealing with this year's Estimates. The hon. Member will see them later.

Mr. JAMES HOPE

May I ask the Secretary to the Treasury what are the repaying Departments from which he gets the £2,000 credit? It is not explained in the note, which says:— The receipts from Repaying Departments have proved greater than we anticipated when the Original Estimate was made. When we were in Committee the hon. Gentleman did not offer any explanation on that point, although I admit that he has been very full in his explanations on other points. On the subject of the whole Vote, I understand it will not be possible to move a reduction now, but, having regard to the enormous increase in this expenditure, I think it is only right we should offer a protest against the way in whioh money is expended on unnecessary publications and challenge the whole Vote on a Division.

Question put, "That this House doth agree with the Committee in the said Resolution."

The House divided: Ayes, 155; Noes, 82.

Division No. 41.] AYES. [7.55 p.m.
Adamson, William Beauchamp, Sir Edward Buckmaster, Stanley O.
Addison, Dr. C. Benn, W. W. (T. H'mt, St. George) Byles, Sir William Pollard
Agnew, Sir George William Birrell, Rt. Hon. Augustine Cameron, Robert
Ainsworth, John Stirling Boland, John Plus Carr-Gomm, H. W.
Allen, Rt. Hon. Charles Peter (Stroud) Booth, Frederick Handel Clough, William
Barnes, G. N. Brace, William Clynes, John R.
Barton, William Brady, Patrick Joseph Cotton, William Francis
Beale, W. P. Brocklehurst, William B. Craig, Herbert J. (Tynemouth)
Crumley, Patrick Lamb, Ernest Henry Ponsonby, Arthur A. W. H.
Davies, David (Montgomery Co.) Lambert, Richard (Wilts, Cricklade) Radford, George Heynes
Davies, Sir W. Howell (Bristol, S.) Lansbury, George Rea, Rt. Hon. Russell (South Shields)
Dawes, J. A. Lawson, Sir W. (Cumbrl'r, Cockerm'th) Rea, Walter Russell (Scarborough)
Denman, Hon. R. D. Leach, Charles Richards, Thomas
Devlin, Joseph Lewis, John Herbert Richardson, Thomas (Whitehaven)
Dillon, John Macdonald, J. R. (Leicester) Roberts, Charles H. (Lincoln)
Donclan, Captain A. Macdonald, J. M. (Falkirk Burghs) Roberts, George H. (Norwich)
Doris, William Macnamara, Rt. Hon. Dr. T. J. Robertson, Sir G. Scott (Bradford)
Duffy, William J. Macpherson, James Ian Robertson, John M. (Tyneside)
Duncan, C. (Barrow-in-Furness) MacVeagh, Jeremiah Roch, Walter F.
Duncan, J. Hastings (York, Otley) M'Callum, John M. Roche, Augustine (Louth)
Edwards, John Hugh (Glamorgan, Mid) McKenna, Rt. Hon. Reginald Russell, Rt. Hon. Thomas W.
Esmonde, Dr. John (Tipperary, N.) M'Micking, Major Gilbert Samuel, J. (Stockton-on-Tees)
Essex, Richard Walter Markham, Sir Arthur Basil Scanlan, Thomas
Farrell, James Patrick Marks, Sir George Croydon Seely, Col. Rt. Hon. J. E. B.
Ffrench, Peter Marshall, Arthur Harold Sheehy, David
Gelder, Sir W. A. Martin, Joseph Shortt, Edward
Gill, A. H. Masterman, C. F. G. Simon, Sir John Allsebrook
Gladstone, W. G. C. Meagher, Michael Smith, Albert (Lancs., Clitheroe)
Glanville, Harold James Meehan, Francis E. (Leitrim, N.) Stanley, Albert (Staffs, N.W.)
Goddard, Sir Daniel Ford Menzies, Sir Walter Sutton, John E.
Goldstone, Frank Molteno, Percy Alport Taylor, John W. (Durham)
Hackett, John Montagu, Hon. E. S. Tennant, Harold John
Hall, Frederick (Normanton) Mooney, John J. Toulmin, Sir George
Harcourt, Robert V. (Montrose) Morgan, George Hay Trevelyan, Charles Philips
Harmsworth, Cecil (Luton, Beds) Morrell, Philip Wadsworth, J.
Haslam, Lewis (Monmouth) Morton, Alpheus Cleophas Walsh, Stephen (Lancs., Ince)
Havelock-Allan, Sir Henry Neilson, Francis Ward, John (Stoke-upon-Trent)
Hayden, John Patrick Nicholson, Sir Charles N. (Doncaster) Watt, Henry A.
Helme, Norval Watson Nolan, Joseph Wedgwood, Josiah C.
Henderson, Arthur (Durham) Norton, Captain Cecil W. White, J. Dundas (Glas., Tradeston)
Higham, John Sharp Nuttall, Harry Whitehouse, John Howard
Hobhouse, Rt. Hon. Charles E. H. O'Brien, Patrick (Kilkenny) Whyte, A. F.
Holmes, Daniel Turner O'Connor, T. P. (Liverpool) Wiles, Thomas
Hope, John Deans (Haddington) O'Doherty, Philip Wilkie, Alexander
Isaacs, Rt. Hon. Sir Rufus O'Grady, James Williams, Penny (Middlesbrough)
John, Edward Thomas O'Neill, Dr. Charles (Armagh, S.) Wilson, Rt. Hon. J. W. (Worcs., N.)
Johnson, W. O'Shaughnessy, P. J. Wilson, W. T. (Westhoughton)
Jones, William (Carnarvonshire) O'Sullivan, Timothy Young, Samuel (Cavan, East)
Jowett, Frederick William Parker, James (Halifax) Young, William (Perth, East)
Joyce, Michael Pearce, Robert (Staffs, Leek)
Keating, Matthew Pearce, William (Limehouse) TELLERS FOR THE AYES.—Mr. Illingworth and Mr. Gulland.
Kilbride, Denis Pease, Rt. Hon. Joseph A. (Rotherham)
King, Joseph Pointer, Joseph
NOES
Agg-Gardner, James Tynte Eyres-Monsell, Bolton M. Peto, Basil Edward
Aitken, Sir William Max Fell, Arthur Pollock, Ernest Murray
Ashley, Wilfrid W. Forster, Henry William Salter, Arthur Clavell
Bagot, Lieut.-Col. J. Goldman, Charles Sidney Sanders, Robert Arthur
Baird, J. L. Gordon, Hon. John Edward (Brighton) Sanderson, Lancelot
Balcarres, Lord Hall, Fred (Dulwich) Smith, Harold (Warrington)
Baldwin, Stanley Hambro, Angus Valdemar Stanley, Hon. G. F. (Preston)
Barnston, Harry Hamilton, Lord C. J. (Kensington) Starkey, John Ralph
Benn, Arthur Shirley (Plymouth) Henderson, Major H. (Berkshire) Swift, Rigby
Benn, Ion Hamilton Hewins, William Albert Samuel Talbot, Lord Edmund
Bennett-Goldney, Francis Hohler, Gerald Fitzroy Terrell, George (Wilts, N.W.)
Beresford, Lord Charles Hunt, Rowland Terrell, Henry (Gloucester)
Bigland, Alfred Hunter, Sir Charles Rodk. (Bath) Thompson, Robert (Belfast, North)
Bird, Alfred Kinloch-Cooke, Sir Clement Touche, George Alexander
Boscawen, Sir Arthur S. T. Griffith- Larmor, Sir J. Tullibardine, Marquess of
Boyle, W. Lewis (Norfolk, Mid) Lloyd, George Ambrose Valentia, Viscount
Bridgeman, William Clive Locker-Lampson, O. (Ramsey) Ward, A. S. (Herts, Watford)
Campbell, Capt. Duncan F. (Ayr, N.) Lonsdale, Sir John Brownlee Wheler, Granville C. H.
Cassel, Felix Lyttelton, Hon. J. C. (Droitwich) White, Major G. D. (Lancs., Southport)
Castlereagh, Viscount MacCaw, William J. MacGeagh Williams, Col. R. (Dorset, W.)
Cave, George Mackinder, Halford J. Willoughby, Major Hon. Claud
Cecil, Evelyn (Aston Manor) McNeill, Ronald (Kent, St. Augustine's) Wolmer, Viscount
Cecil, Lord Hugh (Oxford Univ.) Mason, James F. (Windsor) Wood, John (Stalybridge)
Chaloner, Col. R. G. W. Mount, William Arthur Worthington-Evans, L.
Dalrymple, Viscount Newton, Harry Kottingham Younger, Sir George
Denniss, E. R. B. Paget, Almeric Hugh
Dickson, Rt. Hon. C. Scott Peel, Capt. R. F. (Woodbridge) TELLERS FOR THE NOES.—Mr. James Hope and Mr. Ormsby-Gore.
Doughty, Sir George Perkins, Walter Frank
Duke, Henry Edward

Question put, and agreed to.