Commons Sitting of 15 April 1833

MINUTES.
Bills. Read a third time:—Customs' Wharfs' Conveyance.
Petitions presented. By Mr. F. BUXTON, from Jedburgh, against the Punishment of Death for Forgery.—By Mr. LAMBTON, Mr. F. BUXTON, Mr. HARVEY, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, and Mr. BLAMIRE, Sir OSWALD MOSELEY, and Mr. E. TENNENT, from a Number of Places,—for the Better Observance of the Sabbath.—By Lord JOHN RUSSEL, from Chudley, &c.; and by Mr. A. CHAPMAN, from the Dissenters of Whitby, for a Removal of the Disabilities affecting the Dissenters.—By Mr. ABERCROMBIE, from Edinburgh, in favour of the Royal Burghs (Scotland) Bill; from the Printers of Edinburgh, for the Repeal of the Taxes on Knowledge; from other Trades, for a Repeal of the Duty on Stamp Receipts; and against the Disturbances (Ireland) Bill.—By Mr. LAMBTON, from the Clergy of Durham, against the Church Reform (Ireland) Bill.—By Mr. MURRAY, from Leith, for a free Trade with China.—By Mr. ROEBUCK, from a Literary Society at Worcester, for adopting a National System of Education; from the Disciples of Mr. Owen, in favour of the Factories Regulation Bill; and from St. James's, Bristol, for a Repeal of the Assessed Taxes.—By Sir CHARLES COOTK, from Maryborough, complaining of the Corporation, and praying for Relief.—By Mr. RIOHARD POTTER, from an Association at Manchester, in favour of the Highways Bill.—By Mr. OLIPHANT, from Perth, for an Alteration in the Royal Burghs (Scotland) Bill; and from the Hand-loom Weavers of that Town, for a Board of Trade, and for Relief.—By Sir OSWALD MOSLEY, from two Places, against the Sale of Beer Act.—By Mr. S. LEFEVRE, from Winchester, for a Repeal of the Duty on Malt.—By Mr. VIVIAN, Mr. A. CHAPMAN, Mr. ABERCROMBIE, Mr. BLAMIRE, Mr. MORISON, Mr. SANFORD, Mr. F. BUXTON, Mr. LAMBTON, Mr. MADOCKS, and Mr. S. LEFEVRE, Sir RICHARD BULKELEY, Sir OSWALD MOSLEY, and Sir FRANCIS BLAKE, from seventy-six Places,—for the Abolition of Slavery.—By Sir FRANCIS BUROETT, from Bath, not to Legislate as to Colonial Slavery until further Inquiry was made into the condition of the Slaves; and from St. George's, Hanover Square, complaining of the heavy, and unequal Rate levied on them for the Support of the Police, and for Relief; also complaining of Irish Paupers, and for Poor Laws to Ireland.

PROCLAIMING OF KILKENNY.
On the Question that the House resolve itself into a Committee of Supply—
Mr. O'Connellsaid, that he saw no person present connected with the Irish Government; but he must, notwithstanding, request some information with respect to the Proclamations lately issued by the Lord-lieutenant of Ireland under the Bill which deprived that country of the Constitution. It had been decidedly intimated on the passing of that Bill, that there was no disposition to carry it into effect. It was indeed expressly said, that it never would be carried into effect, except under the pressure of absolute necessity. In spite of this assurance, a most wanton and outrageous act had been committed under the Bill, which sufficiently showed the truth of what he had often said, that despotic power could not be intrusted in the hands of any man. Possession was itself a temptation to abuse it. The Bill had hardly arrived in Ireland before the county of Kilkenny was put out of the pale of the law. Part of that county was, he acknowledged, in a disturbed state; but there was a considerable part of it perfectly tranquil; yet this was punished indiscriminately with the rest. But what he particularly wished to impress upon the House was, that the county of the city of Kilkenny had also been put under the operation of the Act, although there was not the slightest appearance of insubordination in that city to justify it; for, if he was rightly informed, the offences committed there within the last twelve months amounted only to five, the most serious of which was a petty larceny case. One reason assigned for this wanton outrage was that since the county of Kilkenny was in so disturbed a state as to require proclamation, they must also extend the proclamation to the city, or else the inhabitants of the proclaimed districts would nullify the Proclamation by going into the city. This was a most ridiculously frivolous pretext; they must, on this principle, proclaim the whole country at once. The real state of the case was, that it was considered much more convenient for the members of the military tribunals to remain comfortably in their hotels in the city, than to venture out here and there in the really disturbed parts of the country. This was the real reason why a city which had committed no offence, and which contained a population of 24,000 souls, had been put out of the pale of the law. The hon. Member concluded by moving, that there be laid before the
118
House copies of all proclamations issued by the Lord-lieutenant under the Irish Coercive Bill, the reasons given for the same, and the amount of crime committed within the last twelve months in the city of Kilkenny.
Lord Althorpbegged to suggest to the hon. Member the expediency of withdrawing his Motion till the right hon. the Secretary for Ireland took his seat tomorrow. He fully concurred in the observation of the hon. and learned Gentleman, that the House, having granted these extraordinary powers to the Government, was bound to keep a jealous eye over the exercise of them.
Motion withdrawn.

SALARIES OF THE JUDGES.
Mr. Humesaid, as there were strong rumours of very considerable changes in the judicial department, in consequence of some retirements being about to take place, and as some other changes would, of course, follow, he was anxious to remind the noble Lord (Lord Althorp) that the salaries of the Judges had for the last thirty years, been increased to a very enormous extent. When any new appointment took place, he hoped that Government would show that they intended seriously to grant some relief to the country, overburthened by heavy taxation.
Lord Althorpsaid, the present Lord Chief Justice of the Court of King's Bench had accepted that appointment upon a considerable reduction of the salary, which was a sufficient proof that the Government had turned its attention to the subject. He was not, however, prepared to give a specific answer to the question of the hon. Member, nor could he see, that the subject was so pressing as to call upon him to bring it particularly forward that night.
Mr. Cobbettsaid, he did not know by how much the salary of the Chief Justice of the Court of King's Bench had been reduced, but it ought to have been reduced to the standard which prevailed before 1795, for it had been raised, in consequence of the depreciation which had subsequently taken place in the currency. It was then 4,500 l. and it had since been raised to 10,000 l. The salaries of police Magistrates, too, deserved consideration. These were originally fixed at 300 l. a-year, and were now 800 l. He should like to know what that increase had been for?

119
He should like to be told why they might not be brought back to 300 l.? It was by such reductions throughout the establishments of the country, that the noble Lord could alone expect to reduce the expenditure of the country to the means of the people. This was what they expected, from the Reform Bill, which would be of no use to them unless it produced economy.
Lord Althorpstated, that, in 1795, the Judges were in possession of saleable patronage, attached to their office, on which they now no longer had any claim; and it was in remuneration for their loss of that patronage that their salaries had been raised. It should be remembered, that unless the Government paid well, it could not command the services of the ablest lawyers.
Mr. Humewished to ask the noble Lord, whether at present the number of Judges was not too great? That number had been increased some time ago because the Judges had too much business to perform, and he understood that at present there was not sufficient employment for the original number of Judges?
The Solicitor Generalbegged to say, in answer to the question of the hon. Member, that he could assure him as far as regarded the Court to which he (the Solicitor General) belonged, that there was sufficient work there for all the Judges in it; and that, in fact, he believed there was no portion of the labouring classes in London—such as porters, and other hardworking individuals—so severely worked as were the Judges of that Court. He believed, that the other Judges in Westminster-hall were also completely employed, though he could not speak so positively upon that point, as he did not practise in their Courts. With regard to what the hon. Member opposite had said as to the salaries of the Judges, he could assure him, that the office of Chief Justice of the King's Bench was not near so valuable now as it was forty or fifty years ago. That office had been since stripped (he was ready to admit most properly stripped) of such a quantity of valuable patronage—the office of chief clerk, for instance, amongst others—that it was by no means so valuable now as it had been formerly. Under such circumstances an adequate salary must be attached to the office. It would have been much better for the present Chief Justice of the King's Bench to have accepted the office
120
upon its ancient footing than with the salary at present attached to it.
Mr. Harveydid not know how it might be in the Court of King's Bench, but he believed that there were other Judges not fully employed. He had hoped that one of the improvements to be introduced by that Commission over which the hon. and learned Solicitor General so long presided, would have been to marshal the different causes that were set down for trial before the different Courts. For instance, the 500 or 600 causes that were waiting to be heard in the Court of King's Bench might be spread over the Court of Exchequer and the Court of Common Pleas. At present, while some of these cases must wait a year to be tried, some of the Judges were idle. He thought that an officer should have been appointed whose business it should have been to marshal these cases before the different Courts. The Judges were all equally good, and he could not conceive why the cases should not be sent to them indiscriminately. As to the salaries of the Judges the question was not whether the Judges were paid as much or more than other men, or more than formerly, but whether good Judges could not be got for less than 8,000 l. a-year. He would undertake to say, in opposition to the noble Lord, that high salaries did not secure great talents. On the contrary, in proportion as an office was highly paid, it was in general inefficiently filled. It was imputing to the gentlemen of the legal profession an insensibility to all other motives than those of pecuniary interest. He would, however, undertake to say, that the greatest lawyers at all times had been men who thought more of the dignity of their profession than of its emoluments. When it was said that good Judges could not be got unless they were paid very high, he asked, was the honour and dignity of the situation nothing; or were they entirely lost sight of by all the Bar at the present time.
The Solicitor Generalsaid, with regard to what had fallen from the hon. member for Colchester, as to sending causes by rotation to the three Courts of common law in Westminster-hall, that that suggestion had certainly been maturely and deliberately weighed by the Commissioners for inquiring into the state of the law. Though it was an extremely plausible one, there were a great many strong objections to it. The Judges were no doubt all

121
equally good, but then the merits of all were not the same, and it was thought that it would be extremely hard that a man should bring his cause into Court and not know before whom it was to be tried. There was nothing at present to prevent individuals from bringing their causes into the Courts of Common Pleas and Exchequer. He was surprised to hear from the hon. Gentleman, that there was so little business just now in the Court of Common Pleas. This he (the Solicitor General) could state, that there were at present as many remanets in the Court of Exchequer as in the Court of King's Bench. This he could promise the hon. Gentleman and the House, that any measure the object of which would be to facilitate and render cheaper the administration of justice should have his cordial support; and he believed it would have the support of the profession to which he belonged. The House, when it was considering the salaries of the Judges, should bear in mind the innumerable evils that would follow the appointment of a bad Judge, such as new trials, arrests of judgments, &c. He did not pretend to say what ought to be the amount of the emoluments attached to such situations, but he was sure that the House would see that they always should be such as to command the services of the best men in the profession.
Mr. O'Connellthought that none but practical men could be good Judges, and it would be obvious that they could not be selected from men of small practice. With respect to the marshalling of causes hitherto, if one Court was overburthened, they should be transferred to others. With respect to plaintiffs choosing their own Court, that was at least a hardship upon all the defendants. He remembered a Court in Dublin, before fees were abolished, in which there was a considerable fee upon the record; and in that Court seventy-three plaintiffs out of seventy-four gained their causes. Of course, they all carried their causes to that Court. If any newspaper in Dublin had mentioned that circumstance at the time, it would have been prosecuted. He hoped the time was not far distant when local Courts would be established, not confined to a paltry 20 l., but enabled, like the old county Courts, to take cognizance of any cases to any amount. He hoped, also, to see in those Courts that the first witnesses called should be the plaintiff and defendant,
122
even although that would go far to destroy the emoluments of the profession to which he had the honour to belong.
Mr. Charles Bullerthought, good Judges might be got without such very large emoluments. It would be, in his opinion, an improvement, if there was not so great a difference as at present, between the salaries of the puisne Judges and of the Chiefs, which made all the clever men avoid accepting the former, in the hope of getting the latter.
Sir Matthew White Ridleycould not concur in the remarks made by the hon. member for Colchester, that eminent men were induced to look for high situations on the Bench merely from pecuniary motives. He did not see that they deserved such a stigma, when it was well known that many of them were making, at the Bar, double the sum that was paid as salary to a Judge. Mercenary men were not likely to do so. They could not expect to get the ablest men for Judges, if they did not give at least as high salaries as those men would make by following their profession at the Bar.

SUPPLY—NAVY ESTIMATES.
The House went into a Committee of Supply upon the Navy Estimates,
Sir James Graham, in proposing the first vote for the expense of the Admiralty, said, that he felt great pleasure in announcing to the House, that, notwithstanding the reduction of 7,000 l. which had been made under this head last year, a still further reduction of 17,000 l. was made in the present Estimates, together with the sum of 5,000 l. arising from fees, which had been altogether abolished; thus showing a reduction under this head during the last two years of not less than 29,000 l. He had also the pleasure to inform the House that the balance-sheet for the last year was now upon the Table of the House. It would show that the estimates for the last year had not been exceeded; but, on the contrary, that there was a considerable balance remaining out of them. The right hon. Baronet concluded by moving, that the sum of 104,070 l. should be granted for defraying the salaries of officers, and contingent expenses of the Admiralty for the year 1833.
Mr. Humesaid, that as the House had already decided upon the amount of men to be employed, which involved the general question of reduction, he would not

123
trouble it by calling for a division upon any of those resolutions. The right hon. Gentleman had certainly made a great many reductions. The changes had been so great, and the consolidations so numerous, since the right hon. Gentleman had come into his present office, that it was impossible to say exactly what would be the result of the whole; but, as far as they went, he was inclined to believe that they would be useful. The amount of reductions effected was, he admitted, very considerable. The general scale of reduction, however, adopted by his Majesty's Government in the different establishments of the country was much too contracted. The noble Lord opposite must have recourse to much more extensive reductions. Such was the opinion of every individual with whom he (Mr. Hume) conversed upon the subject. Indeed, none but those individuals who were connected with the Government seemed to think it possible to keep up the existing establishments. As the House had already decided as to the number of men to be employed, it would be doing no good to endeavour to cut off this or that vote in the Estimates.
Sir James Grahamsaid, as far as the number of men were concerned, a large majority of the House had already declared it necessary. The amount of the forces must always be guided by the circumstances in which the country was placed. He hoped that next year the necessity for keeping up so large a force would not exist. The hon. Member was exceedingly desirous to guard Government against an increase of expenditure; but he would beg to remind that hon. Member, that, excluding the half-pay, and those items over which his Majesty's Government had no control, there had been a decrease in the last two years of not less than thirty per cent in the expense of the effective service, and that service, he believed, was more efficient than before.
Resolution agreed to.
The next Resolution was, that 21,725 l. be granted to his Majesty to defray the salaries of the officers and contingent expenses of the Navy Pay Office.
Mr. Humeasked, whether the expense of sending money to the outports could not be saved? He saw, in the estimate, a charge of 275 l. for messengers accompanying the money to the dockyards. Of that he did not complain so much, but there was a further sum of 2,000 l. charged,
124
which he considered as so much money wasted. The marines were paid by bills, which the different bankers paid, and he did not know why the seamen could not be paid in the same manner.
Mr. Poulett Thomsonhad given the subject his best attention, having once supposed, like his hon. friend, that a considerable saving might be made; but he found that the business was now carried on at the cheapest rate possible. The bankers would not undertake to send the money unless a deposit was placed in their hands, and a commission given them. If, indeed, the Bank of England had any branch banks at the outports, the business might have been easily arranged. In the Act establishing the branch banks of the Bank of England, a clause was inserted forbidding these branches from making any payments, except where the branch was actually established. There was a branch at Exeter, but there was none either at Portsmouth or Plymouth; and therefore it was impossible to make an arrangement such as he had contemplated.
Mr. Humewished to know how the business was done now? Were notes or gold sent down to pay the seamen?
Mr. Poulett Thomson: Both notes and gold were sent.
Mr. Humethought, with the large balance which the Government had in the hands of the Bank of England, means might be found to pay the seamen without the expense of remitting the money. He supposed, if 20,000 l. were lodged in the hands of the bankers at the out ports, they would undertake to provide the money whenever it was wanted.
Mr. Poulett Thomsonwould not like to trust the bankers.
Vote agreed to.
The next Resolution was, that 22,109 l. be granted to his Majesty to defray the salaries of the officers and the contingent expenses of the scientific department of the navy.
Mr. Humethought that this was the opportunity he ought to lake to bring the case of the students of naval architecture before the House. The returns, however, which he had moved for had been so recently completed, that they were not yet printed. He therefore was not able to lay the case of the young men, who he thought had been very hardly treated, fully before the House. He would only say, that while other nations were diligently

125
making a progress in naval architecture, we seemed to be retrograding. Other countries thought it necessary to keep up their scientific establishments, but we were destroying ours. He thought at least, that the men who for twenty-six years had been bred up to this profession, who were not only good practical shipbuilders, but well acquainted with all the science connected with their profession, he could not help thinking that it would have been wise to have formed such a body of men into a small board, rather than break up the establishment altogether. At present no plan was followed in building our ships, but one was built or altered according to the whim of one man, and another was built or altered according to the whim of another man. There was no principle whatever followed in building our ships, because we had not one system of education and one mode of instruction.
Sir James Grahamsaid, that after the best information they could obtain, the Board of Admiralty thought the most proper course to pursue was to appoint men who united scientific knowledge with practical experience. He could assure the hon. Member, that measures would be taken to give the public all the information which might be laid before the Board of Naval Architecture.
Mr. Humewas desirous of knowing; explicitly whether Captain Symonds's plan had been successful or not? He understood that the Vernon, which had been built on the principles suggested by that officer, had turned out a complete failure. It was now two years and a half since the experiment had been tried, and it was only right the public should know whether or not it had answered the purposes it was designed for.
Sir James Grahamanswered, that as far as the Board of Admiralty was advised upon the subject, the superiority of the Vernon and of all the other vessels built under Captain Symonds's superintendence to vessels built upon any other system was remarkably great. The officers appointed to try their efficiency had reported those vessels to be of extraordinary strength and power, with all the good qualities of the lightest vessels.
Captain Dundasdeclared, on the authority of Sir Francis Collier, who commanded the Vernon, that the experiment had fully succeeded.
Vote agreed to.
On the Motion that 114,970 l. be granted for salaries of Officers and expenses of Naval Establishments,
Mr. Humeobjected to the Captains-Superintendants of the Dock-yards of Pembroke and Woolwich receiving pay in addition to their pay as captains of yachts.
Sir James Grahamsaid, if there was one thing more than another for which he might take credit, it was his endeavour to reduce the expenditure for the royal yachts. One of these was constantly at Pembroke, the other at Woolwich, and the captains of each did full and active duty as Superintendants of those yards, [Mr. Hume: Are there only two royal yachts?] There were formerly five. One of these, which had been usually at the service of the Lord-lieutenant of Ireland he had wholly done away with. Two were afloat at the command of his Majesty, and he did not think that the House or the country would object to his Majesty, who had been bred up in the navy, having two vessels for his sole use. The other two were, by the arrangement he had alluded to, no longer sinecures, but tributary to the public service.
Mr. Humesaid, then there were, in fact, still four yachts. He freely admitted the propriety of placing two at the disposal of his Majesty, but the other two should, in his opinion, be put down.
Sir James Grahamsaid, that, from the time of William 3rd. to the present day, there had never been less than four royal yachts. George 3rd., when at Weymouth, had always three in immediate attendance upon him. He (Sir J.) thought it right to keep up the number of four, that the other two might be ready if they were ever wanted.
Mr. Humesaid, they should be kept up, not on the ground of usage, but for the purpose of use. Why had they applied schedules A and B to certain boroughs? Because they did not want them. Yet usage might, on the same principle, have shielded those boroughs, as now it was advanced to uphold these yachts. He was sorry to hear such reasons adduced for maintaining what the country did not require.
Resolution agreed to.
On the Question that a sum not exceeding 438,426 l. be granted to his Majesty for the wages of artificers, &c, employed

127
in his Majesty's naval establishments at home,
Mr. B. Carterstated, that he had a petition in his possession from a number of the inhabitants of Portsmouth, complaining of the hardships to which the artificers of Portsmouth Dock-yard had been subjected, by the discharge of a great many hands, by the degradation of many who had acquired a certain rank in the yard to an inferior rank, and, above all, by the employment of convicts in the yard. He was happy to hear that his Majesty's Government intended to correct the last-mentioned evil; and he trusted that the intention would be carried into effect with as little delay as possible; for nothing could be more irksome to honest and free men, than to be associated in labours with persons of so different a description.
Captain Dundasobserved, that the attention of the House had been for many weeks called to the misery of the people of Ireland. That misery was at least equalled, if not exceeded, by the misery of the inhabitants of a district not four miles from the metropolis; he meant Deptford; where, in consequence of the number of artificers who had been discharged from the King's yard, the Poor rates had been raised to 18 s. in the pound.
Sir James Grahamobserved, that the predecessors of the present Ministers had fixed upon 6,000 as the number to which the artificers in the various Dock-yards might be reduced. After having been three years in office, his Majesty's present Government had felt it their painful duty to make this, almost the last saving in the way of reduction, of which the naval department was capable; and had thought that the time had arrived when they might discharge 500 artificers, reducing the number from 6,500 to 6,000. It should be considered, however, that the sum saved, namely 37,000 l. was spread over the whole of his Majesty's Dock-yards. That it fell more heavily on Portsmouth Dock-yard than on any other was owing to the circumstance that almost as many labourers were employed in that yard as in any other two yards in the kingdom. He was happy to confirm the statement of the hon. member for Portsmouth, that his Majesty's Government were of opinion, that the employment of convicts in the Dock-yards might and ought to cease, both with reference to political and as
128
moral considerations. It appeared, that the demand for labour at Van Diemen's Land was so great that this step might be taken without difficulty; and he spoke upon this subject the opinion both of his noble friend, the late, and of his right hon. friend the present. Secretary of State for the Colonial Department. Time, however, must be given for the arrangement. If the convicts were all removed at once, the sudden demand for labourers in the Dock-yards would create an inconvenient rise in the price of that labour. Another difficulty in the arrangement was caused by the consideration, that many of the convicts had already gone through the greater portion of their time, and that, in such cases it might be desirable to allow them to complete their time in the yards. He would, however, undertake to say, that no fresh convicts should be sent there. He had to add, in making the reductions, care had been taken to keep the most efficient men.
Vote agreed to.
On the Question, that a sum of 63,700 l. be granted to defray the expense of new works and improvements in the Dockyards,
Sir James Grahamsaid, that he wished to call the attention of the Committee to this vote, the decision of which would, in fact, involve the question what should be the future outlay of the Breakwater at Plymouth. The late Sir John Rennie had recommended that the work should be finished with solid masonry; that recommendation was adopted by his son, and the Admiralty, after having obtained every possible information on the matter, supported the recommendation. The last winter had afforded a severe trial of the efficiency of the work, and he was happy to say, that the result was perfectly satisfactory. He had received a letter upon the subject, and should beg leave to read a few lines to the House. The writer stated, that although it had blown a hurricane during the past week, such as had never been equalled since the disastrous gale of November, 1824, all the vessels in the Sound had ridden it out in safety, and the work itself had suffered very little damage. Only a few stones had been thrown over to the Northern side. All that part of it which had been finished in solid masonry was left uninjured, and the few stones which had been swept off were removed from that part which had not

129
been so finished. He wished only to add now, that to the immortal honour of Sir John Rennie, the sum required for the works would fall short of the estimate he had sent in. That estimate amounted to 1,200,000 l., but the expense amounted only to 1,100,000 l.
Mr. Humethought, that if the work was to be finished, the sooner it was finished the better; for that would be sounder economy than leaving it uncompleted for a long period. If it could be finished better with solid masonry than in any other manner, he should not oppose its being so finished; but he thought it should be done without further delay. He wished to know on what principle it was, that Deptford Dock-yard was to be put down, and new Dock-yards at Sheerness and Pembroke were to be built? He did not understand this mode of proceeding. Sheerness was at a considerable distance from the metropolis, and in an exposed place, and he wished to know why the public money was to be expended in the erection of a Dock-yard there?
Sir James Grahamsaid, that if the question was now for the first time to be discussed, whether or not there should be a Dock-yard at Sheerness, he might possibly be found to agree with the hon. member opposite; but as 2,000,000 l. had already been spent upon this work, and as the money now required to finish it was comparatively small, he recommended that it should be finished, in order to prevent the utter wasting of so great an outlay. As to Pembroke Dock-yard, he thought that a most fit place to select for such a purpose; for the depth of water was considerable, and the wages were low, and there were many things that rendered it a proper place for the building of ships. By having these two Dock-yards, he should be able to do what he had long wished, to know exactly the comparative expense of building and of repairing ships, because the two sorts of works, and consequently the two sorts of accounts, would be kept perfectly distinct.
Vote agreed to.
On the Question, that 871,858 l. be granted for the half-pay of the Royal Navy and Marines,
Mr. Humeobjected, on the ground that gross extravagance was committed in that department of the public service in consequence of no care being taken to place persons enjoying half-pay upon full pay
130
when additional officers were required for the active service of the Navy.
Captain D. Dundaswas surprised at the remark just made by the hon. member for Middlesex. In his opinion, the recommendation of the hon. Member was anything but judicious; and there was no one, he was sure, in that House, who had the slightest acquaintance with the naval service, who would not be ready to testify to the fact, that sufficient justice was not done to the naval service. There were many officers of the navy who had served thirty and forty years, who had not above 3s. 6d. a-day, and he referred to the case of the pursers as one in point.
Admiral Codringtonsaid, this was a subject to which he had paid great attention, and he must say, that the most rank injustice was dealt out to all classes of half-pay officers in the navy. There was no other class in the country so badly provided for. The allowance which was given to pursers was a disgrace to the country. They were a body of men who filled most arduous situations, and were sometimes necessarily intrusted with the most important secrets; yet the allowance, after thirty years' service, was only 3s. a day. With regard to the treatment of other retired officers of the navy, it was scandalous; and he could adduce instances of service and sufferings that were remunerated by stipends which would not be offered by any gentleman to his servants. He knew one instance of a person who had received several dangerous wounds, amongst which was the loss of an eye, and the allowance for all those sufferings was only 6d. a-day. One person who had served under himself at Navarino lost an eye there, and his remuneration was 2l. The fact was, there appeared to be a systematic attempt to put down the navy. If there were any such intention, he thought it but right that all other pensions, as well as those of the navy, should be abolished. He would mention several other instances in which injustice was done to the navy. There had been several petitions presented from men who served at Navarino, and who lost every rag of their clothes in that action, but they received no remuneration or gratuity. There was one general petition in their behalf, forwarded to Sir John Gore, who, by order of his present Majesty, then Lord High Admiral, presented it to the Admiralty, and strange to say, when he inquired for that petition.

131
on his return from the Mediterranean, it was not to be found. It had never been heard of at the Treasury, nor was it to be found at the Admiralty. He could not avoid saying, that there appeared to have been a determination to inflict every injustice on all those who had served at Navarino. When he came to make a comparison between the pensions granted to officers of the navy, and those granted to other persons, the injustice done to the navy was still more manifest. He saw by the Pension List, that 500 l. a-year was given to Mr. Thomas N. Holmes, a young gentleman, with whose services to the State no man was acquainted, whilst the oldest Captains in the navy had not more than 250 l. a-year as a retired allowance. Sir Benjamin Hallowell was an officer of the most distinguished merit, who served under Nelson, and he now received 750 l. a-year, whilst a retired Secretary received a pension of 2,000 l. a-year. He would go through the list of such discrepancies were it not that that he should tire the House. He remembered that when the navy used to be paid in Bank-notes, a ship would be ordered off immediately the men received the money, perhaps to Gibraltar, where the one-pound note passed for only 14 s., and thus the seamen were most shamefully defrauded of one-third of their pay. He had himself received his quarterly bills on foreign stations in dollars reckoned at more than 9s. each, whilst at the same time the army was paid in dollars taken at only 4s. and a fraction. In every point the navy had been treated in a manner disgraceful to the country. There was another hardship with respect to widows' pensions. Officers were made to contribute 3d. in the pound out of their pay towards the Widows' Pension Fund, whilst their widows were refused all benefit from the fund unless they could swear to their possessing no other property. He complained likewise, that where such men as boatswains had served meritoriously afloat, and were afterwards employed in the dock-yards, the two services were not allowed to be taken conjointly in order to make out a period which would entitle them to a pension. He conceived that the Foreign Enlistment Bill was a great injustice to the navy, for why should not seamen and officers be allowed to employ their professional skill, or pursue their avocation where they pleased, and for those who were willing to reward them?
132
He did not see why officers who bad no employment at home should be prevented from entering foreign service, and learning their trade as shoemakers, as other persons were allowed to do. Instead of injuring the British navy, it would greatly benefit it. He was glad that the convicts were at last to be removed from the dock-yards, for respectable men felt themselves degraded in being obliged to work in company with such characters. He could not conclude without drawing a comparison between the pay of Commissaries of the array, and Pursers in the navy. A Commissary-general received 1l. 9s. 3d. per diem, a Deputy Commissary-general received 14 s. 8d., an Assistant Commissary-general 7s. 4d., and the Deputy Assistant Commissary-general 4s. 11 d. per diem. Now, the senior Purser of the navy had been made in 1777, and received no more than 5s. a-day; the senior Purser made in 1799, received but 4s. a-day; and other Pursers made in 1808, received but 3s. a-day. These were inconsistencies disgraceful to the country, and which ever way he turned, be found the navy always dealt more harshly by than any other service.
Mr. O'Dwyeralso objected to the system upon which the navy was governed, and could say, from his own knowledge, that the complaints of the gallant Admiral were well founded. He was sorry to see an indisposition in the Government to relieve the country of the half-pay paid to officers who had rendered no services, and performed no duties whatever. Promotion was given entirely to young men of aristocratic families.
Sir James Grahamwould challenge the closest investigation into the promotions of the navy, since he had had the honour of being placed at the head of the department. He decidedly agreed with the gallant Admiral, that promotions must be held out as a stimulus to the profession, and that they were at once the cheapest and most honourable mode of procuring and rewarding services. Government, however, was placed between a cross-fire, for, whilst the hon. member for Middlesex attacked it for want of economy, another party assailed it for carrying economy too far, in withholding promotions and rewards from the naval service. He would say, that so far from the Admiralty having any objection to naval officers entering the merchant service, the fact of a person having go served would rather be considered

133
as a claim to attention and favour. He must assure the gallant Admiral, the member for Devonport, that the fullest consideration had been given by the Admiralty to the memorial from Navarino. It was in the power of the gallant Officer to bring the subject before the House, when he should be prepared to state the grounds of the refusal given by the Admiralty to the prayer of that memorial. With respect to the case of the Pursers, he begged to remind the gallant Admiral, that a Purser of a first-rate ship was in the receipt of an income of 900 l. a-year, which was much larger than any income received by a Commissary-general.
Vote agreed to.
The House resumed.

POLICE OFFICES (LONDON).
Mr. Lamb, in moving the second reading of the Bill, stated, that its principle object was to consolidate former Acts relating to the Metropolitan Police. There were some alterations, however, introduced into this measure, which it was his duty shortly to advert to. In the new arrangement which was proposed, economy was an object of much consideration, and, with a view to diminish expense, it was thought that one of the Metropolitan Police-offices might be got rid of. It was supposed that the Whitechapel-office could be spared with the least inconvenience, and therefore a clause had been introduced into the Bill for doing away with that office. He understood, however, that the abolition of the office had excited some discontent amongst persons residing in that part of the metropolis, and as his Majesty's Government had no other object but to render the police establishment as efficient as possible at the least possible expense, if it was felt that the abolition of the Whitechapel-office would produce any serious public inconvenience, he had no disposition to press it. It was proposed to have one Magistrate at each of the Police-offices, but in effecting that arrangement some difficulties had presented themselves. In the first place, it was found that in some cases it was necessary, under Acts of Parliament, that convictions should be made by two Magistrates. Upon looking into the law, however, he found that the principle had been so little attended to, that he could see no objection to the introduction of a clause empowering one Police Magistrate to
134
convict. It was also an objection, that when one Magistrate had to discharge the duties of the office, he could not be expected to give night attendance, and this would give additional power to the police Inspectors, under whose authority innocent persons might be incarcerated for the night. He felt this was an objection to the proposed arrangement, but, upon reflection, he did not think that it could lead to much practical inconvenience, for he understood that, in the City of London the attendance of the Magistrates at night was dispensed with without any inconvenience or complaint. The present Bill also introduced some regulations for oyster-shops selling soda and ginger-beer, which were put under the same regulations as beer-houses with respect to the hours of opening and closing. He should only detain the House to add, that as the Metropolitan Police Act was nearly expired, he hoped that no unnecessary delay would be thrown in the way of the present measure. Any suggestions for its improvement it would be his duty to attend to when the measure was in Committee.
Mr. Haweswas glad to see, that the design of the Bill was to introduce economy into the police system. He would not object to the second reading of the Bill if the hon. Member would consent to have a Committee appointed to consider the institution of the police generally.
Mr. Lambhad no objection to have a Committee appointed, but he thought that, as its inquiries would take up a long time, it would be better to defer it for the present Session. At any rate, he hoped that the present Bill would be suffered to pass before the Committee was appointed.
Mr. Haweswould trust entirely to the hon. Member's promise of having a Committee appointed to inquire into the subject, and hoped that some fresh measures of police would be founded on the Report made by that Committee. He would not, therefore, oppose the second reading of the present Bill.
Mr. George Frederick Youngwished to know if the Lambeth-street Office was to remain or not? If it was not, he had a few observations to make in opposition to the present Bill.
Mr. Lambsaid, whether that office was to be dispensed with or not, would be determined afterwards.
Bill read a second time.