Commons Sitting of 29 July 1807

SIERRA LEONE COMPANY'S BILL.
On the motion for the third reading of this bill,
Mr. Dent roseand observed, that the grants made by parliament to the company had been claimed for the purpose of introducing civilization into Africa. The company, however, had failed in their projects The sums granted them amounted in all to about 109,000 l. This sum, as they had
*13 Edw. III. Rot. Parl.§ 5. c. 13; 14 Edw. III. stat. 1. cap. 21; 14 Edw. III. stat. 2. cap. 1; 17 Edw. III. Rot. Parl. § 28; 21 Edw. III. Rot Parl. § 11, 16; 25 Edw. III. Rot. Parl. § 12; 36 Edw. III. Rot, Parl. § 18; 36 Edw.III. cap. 11. † 50 Edw. III. Rot. Parl. § 20, 28. ‡3 Car. I. cap. 2; 16 Car. I. cap. 8; 12 Car. II cap. 4. II 1 Gul. et Mar. sess. 2. cap. 2.
1002
not executed the purpose for which it was granted, ought now to be refunded; for he did not think that parliament should be made to pay for the fanciful notions of any set of men.
Mr. Wilberforcesaid, that when gentlemen spoke of the sums of money that had been voted to the Sierra Leone company, they should consider that a great proportion of those sums were paid to support those men whom government must otherwise have been at the expense of supporting. The first class of those men were the blacks, who had served with the British army in the contest with America, and after that contest had been sent into Nova Scotia. Having sent a memorial to the government, complaining of the coldness of the climate to which they were sent, the government applied to the Sierra Leone company, to admit them into a colony much more congenial to their constitutions than the climate of Nova Scotia was. The company then accepted, in the first place, of nearly 1000 Nova-Scotia blacks, which government must, otherwise, have been at the expence of maintaining. Afterwards, when it became an object of policy to expel the Maroons from the island of Jamaica, government again applied to the company to take them, and they most unwillingly accepted of 5 or 6 hundred of these men. Those 1500 men, who otherwise would have been chargeable to the government, had been maintained by the company for a considerable number of years; and he hoped that it would be taken into the account, when the aids were mentioned which the company had received from government. The reason of the failure of the company in its principal objects was the continuance of the slave trade, which they had on the best ground calculated would have been abolished many years ago. Still, however, in the end, he trusted this colony would produce the happiest effects in the civilization of mankind. Like all other colonies, it had great difficulties to encounter in its outset; but he trusted it had taken deep root, and would be the means of civilizing a considerable portion of Africa. These higher objects ought not to be lost sight of Those who thought most highly of the West-India colonies ought to be the best friends of this settlement, for they must be convinced that this country owed a great debt to Africa.
Mr. Edenallowed that the object of the company had in a great measure failed;

1003
but the question was, what was the cheapest Mode of maintaining the Nova-Scotians and Maroons which must be a charge or government? It would be cheaper to Maintain them where they were than to remove them to any other place. He rested his assent to the bill on that ground, for he did not expect much from the project of civilization.
Mr. Huskissonsaid, that if his hon. friend would consider the real circumstances of the case, he must be convinced, that if the projects of the company for promting civilization had not been more extensive, it was because the views under which they were formed had been defeated, by parliament not having sooner effected the abolition of the slave trade, and he thought it was highly unreasonable to talk of calling on the company for a reimbursement of the sums advanced to them, without at the same time giving them credit for the maintenance of the Maroons and,Nova- Scotians, entirely defrayed by them, and which otherwise must have been defrayed from the public purse.
Mr. Fullersaid, that he always conceived the sums of money advanced by government to the Sierra Leone company as done entirely with a view to conciliate the support of a certain description of gentlemen within these walls, and he thought it impossible for the committee of finance to overlook so flagrant a waste of the public money, without recommending that the reimbursement should be made by the company, which he thought should be done amongst the wealthy bankers and merchants who composed that company.
Mr. Sheridansaid, that unless the company had taken the Nova-Scotians and Maroons, the country must have paid 6,000 l. annually for their maintenance. If, therefore, the money received by the company was to be refunded, they would be entitled to come with their bill for the maintenance of these people.
Lord H. Pettysupported the same principle, and considered the government bound to continue its protection to the black inhabitants of Sierra Leone, whom it would be the most cruel injustice to abandon, after the fidelity and attachment they had manifested to the British government.
Mr. H. Thorntonsaid, that he wished the house to understand in what sense he considered the undertaking at Sierra Leone to have answered, and in what sense not to have answered; Since it Was important
1004
that just sentiments should be entertained in respect to the great subject of African civilization. The company had been instituted at a period, as they had imagined, of profound peace, and strong hopes had been entertained of an early abolition of the slave trade. In both these points they had been remarkably disappointed. Another great cause, however, of the disappointment of their original plans, had been the introduction of a very great and untoward body of Nova-Scotians into this colony, by whom a completely new character had been given to the undertaking. No less than 11 or 1200 colonists being received into the settlement, it had become the primary duty to provide for their maintenance and well-being, and a most heavy charge had been the consequence. The idea of establishing a considerable trade with the interior, which was one part of the original intention, had, partly through the causes which he had mentioned, and partly through a war with the natives, been relinquished; the idea of profit to the proprietors, if entertained by any of them, had vanished; the hope of making great and early progress in civilizing the surrounding natives had also been disappointed; still, however, he had the satisfaction of saying, that both the Nova-Scotians and the Maroons, amounting to 11 or 1200, had gradually improved in character, and that there now, therefore, existed a body of colonists on the coast of Africa, speaking the English language, attached to the English people, advancing in civilization and morals, and increasing in numbers, from whom, undoubtedly, and from whose children, this country might hope to derive substantial advantages, Some foundation at least had been laid, on which the government might build if they should think proper, and if circumstances should favour. The colony, as he thought, in whatever sense it might be said to have failed, had afforded proof of the practicability of civilizing Africa. What were the great impediments to the improvements of a country? Either something, first, in the climate; or, secondly, in the soil; or, thirdly, in the character of the inhabitants. The climate of Sierra Leone had now been shewn by experience to be about as good as that of other tropical countries. The soil had proved in many parts of it highly favourable to tropical produce. A very good and a new species of coffee had been found naturally to grow there, and most other articles, cultivated in

1005
the West Indies were indigenous. Natives also had been Willing to work as free labourers, and at reasonable rates. In no one of these respects was there any insuperable obstacle to civilization. This country, moreover, was expressly bound to take charge of the Maroons, and to bear the expense of providing for them, by the terms on which the Sierra Leone company had received them, and the Nova-Scotians had also some claim to consideration. Sierra Leone, indeed, now assumed nearly the same character as various other African forts to which parliament had been used to grant from 20,000 l. to 30,000 l. per annum. It would be, therefore, for the government to consider how many and which of the several forts they would maintain, and he believed that they would find many circumstances to favour the maintenance among others of the Sierra Leone settlement. He had himself long wished to see this colony transferred to government, having been very unwilling to come annually to parliament for the grant of a sum, of which he, as one of the directors, was to be the dispenser, and of which some gentlemen were every year questioning the propriety. The grant was now about to cease, and it would be for the parliament and the government to act hereafter as might, under all the circumstances, appear expedient.—The bill was then passed.

COMPLAINT RESPECTING THE POOLE WRIT.
Colonel Woodpresented a petition on behalf of W. Spurrier, who was committed into the custody of the serjeant at arms, for his conduct on the subject of the Poole Writ; stating that he had been guilty of a breach of the privilege of the house, and thereby incurred its serious displeasure; and being now fully sensible of his misconduct, most humbly begged pardon for it, and he threw himself on the mercy of the house, humbly hoping that this his contrition might be accepted, and that the house would forgive him, &c. The petition being read, colonel Wood moved, that the petitioner be brought to the bar to-morrow, in order to be discharged.
The Secretary at Warcalled the attention of the house to the case. The petitioner had kept possession of the writ for 17 days. His son was at first a candidate, and then another in his interest, so that he had very interested motives on this occasion. He acted with a view of turning the election in favour of his family. He had no wish to prevent the lenity of the house
1006
being extended to this gentleman, but this was a very bad example. He trusted some provision would be made to prevent a recurrence of the offence.
Mr. Fulleragreed in the sentiments the right hon. baronet.
Mr. W. Smiththought this case more serious in its nature than that of Mr. Brundrett; the one being a mere agent, the other a sort of principal in misconduct. This gentleman stated, that he paid 30 guineas for having the writ, and that his object was only to keep it in safe custody. It was impossible to credit this assertion. There had hardly ever been so bad a case as this before the house, upon a subject of this nature, although there was one about 40 years ago something like it. He Wished a stop to be put to such practices in future. He would not oppose any lenity which gentlemen wished to shew in this instance, but the case was really a serious one.
The Chancellor of the Exchequeradmitted the offence of the petitioner to be serious, but he could not help wishing that the hon. gent who spoke last had expressed his disapprobation of it when the case of Mr. Brundrett was before the house, when nothing but lenity was talked of on that side of the house. He had no objection to a parliamentary enactment to prevent such practices in future, but he saw no particular reason for being rigorous in this case.
Mr. Rosesaid, he should certainly Feel himself disposed to inflict a more severe degree of punishment both on Brundrett and Spurrier, had he not been well assured that a bill was about to be brought into parliament, that would prevent such shameful and abusive practices. It should be enacted, that as soon as the clerk of the crown had made out the writs, they Should be immediately transmitted by post to the different sheriffs, under a certain penalty.
Lord H. Pettythought the house justified in the lenity it shewed on the last occasion when the subject was discussed, nor had he any objection to the lenity now proposed. He wished the house to proceed to the immediate adoption of some measure to prevent this mischief in future.
Mr. Barhamadmitted the impropriety of the practice in which this petitioner was concerned; but reminded the house that too many of its own members were intimately acquainted with, if not implicated in something of the same kind; but he,wished the house to stand well with the

1007
public, which it would never do by wreaking its vengeance on an individual, for doing only that which was well known to attach to others, and had so long passed unnoticed. If the house wished to continue in possession of the public confidence, and without it the country could not be saved, it would not be rigorous upon an individual for that sort of conduct which although reprobated in the house, was too often practised out of it. If members wished to be strict in this business, let them begin with themselves. He made these general observations from his feelings, without reference to any individual: of Mr. Spurrier he knew nothing; had never spoken to him, but he loved an impartial administration of justice.
Mr. Pole Carewcautioned the house as to attempts to remedy this evil, and reminded it of the fate of former efforts of that kind.
Mr. Binghamexpressed himself extremely glad at the lenity of the punishment that was inflicted on the prisoner, and the more especially, when he considered the character of that high tribunal before whom the prisoner stood; they were both the judges and the jury in the case, and they acted worthy of their high character in administering justice with mercy.
Mr. Lushingtonmoved an amendment, that instead of the petitioner being brought up to-morrow, he should be brought up tomorrow se'nnight.
Mr. S. Thorntonthought this case the most extraordinary he had heard of in the course of the 24 years he had sat in parliament. He should vote for the amendment.
Mr. Windhamthought rigour the less necessary in this case, as the house was about to provide a remedy against this evil occurring in future: for the great object of punishment was the prevention of crimes.
Mr. Wilberforcewas disposed to vote for the more severe punishment, on account of the answer which the petitioner gave to the house yesterday; but on account of his age and infirmity, he should not oppose any lenity which might be proposed to be shewn to him.
Mr. Lockhartthought the house had been somewhat remiss in not promulgating the law upon this subject, and was therefore disposed to be lenient in the present instance.—The house then divided. For the original motion 45; for the amendment 29; majority 16.

VACCINE INOCULATION:—REWARD TO DR. JENNER.
The house having re-
1008
solved itself into a committee of supply,
The Chancellor of the Exchequerrose to call the attention of the committee to the Report of the Royal College of Physicians, respecting the mode discovered by Dr. Jenner, of preventing the small-pox, the severest infliction, as a disease, to which mankind was subject. Whatever might have been the origin of the discovery, it had never been known, before that gentleman made it public, that the Vaccine disease could be communicated by inoculation. If that discovery should prevent the smallpox, it was hardly possible to characterize its value in terms too strong. When the committee considered the advantages that had already resulted from it, and that would in future result from it, when the prejudice that existed against it should subside, he was sure the committee would not consider the proposition he meant to make extravagant, but liberal and just to the individual. Nothing was so difficult as to fix upon any standard, whereby to measure what should be the grant of that house upon such an occasion. The subject had been under the consideration of parliament some years since, but then there had not been time to satisfy the house of the value of the discovery, and therefore only 10,000 l. had been voted to Dr. Jenner, instead of 20,000 l. which his friends had proposed. The enquiry that had been recently made, was perfectly satisfactory to his mind, and consequently he proposed to move a grant of 10,000 l. which, with the sum already granted to Dr. Jenner, would amount to the sum originally proposed by his friends to be voted to him. It was unnecessary for him to urge any more arguments in support of his proposition, to those who had read the Report. If they assumed, that the inoculation for the small-pox was a benefit to mankind, they might then be able to estimate how much greater a benefit this discovery was, which, as appeared by the report, Was a certain security against the small-pox. It appeared, that of those who had that disease naturally, one in six died, whilst of those inoculated for that disease, only one in 300 died. But of 164,381 cases of persons vaccinated, only three had died, which made the mortality only one in 54,741. It would be impossible after that statement, to represent more favourably the advantages of the discovery. And when the deaths and all the cases of inconvenience that had occurred, in that number of cases were

1009
taken together, they amounted to 179 only out of the 164,381, Which was an infinitely smaller proportion than the actual mortality by the inoculation for the small-pox. But it was not this country alone that was benefited by the discovery, the whole World participated in the advantages resulting from it. An objection might be made to the utility of the discovery, because it tended to increase population, but he should prefer the principles of practical humanity, in preserving life where it existed, to the encouragement of those checks mentioned by Mr. Malthus, whereby population might be kept down. If they were to go into a calculation of the number of lives that had been saved by the discovery, and the expence to the public spared by the diminution of the number of persons in the hospitals, they might have a mean of estimating the advantages of this important discovery. On all these grounds, he would move the committee, "That a sum, not exceeding 10,000 l. be granted to his majesty, to be paid to doctor Edward Jenner, as a further reward for promulgating his discovery of the Vaccine Inoculation, by which a mild, efficacious, and not contagious mode of superseding that dreadful malady the Small-Pox is established; and that the same be issued and paid without any fee or other deduction whatsoever."
Mr. Shaw Lefevredeclared it was with extreme regret he opposed the motion. He entertained for Dr. Jenner the most sincere respect, yet he could not think that this was a period for disposing of 10,000 l. where it appeared by the Report of the college of physicians, which spewed that in 50 or 60 instances, at least, the plan had not succeeded, that, at the least, it was not infallible. The late period of the session, when so many members were necessarily out of town, was also a sufficient reason with him for withholding his approbation to the proposed motion. It had been said that Dr. Jenner had discovered the invention for which a reward was now sought to be conferred. He begged, however, to state that a similar practice had been entertained in Dorsetshire since the year 1777.
Lord H. Pettycontended, that infallibility ought not to be made the test of great discoveries, which ought rather to be estimated by general averages. He was disposed to go farther than the right hon. chancellor of the exchequer, though he should not take upon him to make any spe-
1010
cific proposition to the committee. There was no standard, whereby a great public discovery could be estimated, that would not enhance the value of Dr. Jenner's discovery, if tried by it. If considered with reference to the national benefits resulting from it—to the advantages that he might have derived from his discovery, if he had not published it to the world—to the effect it had in raising the fame, the honour, and the character of the country—there was no standard for estimating the merit of any public discovery under which Dr. Jenner would not have a peculiar claim upon the gratitude and liberality of the house. It appeared by the Report, that the deaths by the small-pox had increased since the discovery; and though he should not wish to use any an compulsion, or to interfere with the liberty that all persons should have, to act as they thought most adviseable for their own health, or for that of their family, still he was of opinion, that persons who preferred the inoculation for the small-pox, should not be allowed to endanger the health of others. Such persons, in his opinion, ought to be confined to their houses whilst affected by the disease, and not suffered to spread infection through the community. If any proof were wanted of the value of the discovery, it would be found in the ready reception which it had met with from all nations, even the least enlightened of Asia, where prejudices were most deeply rooted. It was highly gratifying too to witness the zeal with which the gentlemen of the medical profession, not only in the metropolis, but in all parts of the country, had promoted the interests of humanity, by adopting and acting upon this important discovery.
General Tarletonbore testimony to the value of the discovery, from the number of the military whose lives had been saved by it. It was, besides, an important circumstance, that the troops on recovery might leave their barracks, and others succeed them without any danger of infection. Military men were said to be most fond of, praising great conquerors, but, in his opinion, this gentleman who saved the lives of millions, was entitled to more praise than the most successful conqueror.
Mr. Sturges Bourneconcurred entirely with the noble lord, in the whole of what he had advanced, but most particularly so in the necessity there was for the adoption of some legislative measure, to prevent persons from bringing intentionally infectious

1011
diseases into large and populous cities and towns, which must be the case in again introducing the inoculation for the smallpox. He had been informed it was the practice of the Small-pox Hospital, to inoculate out-patients, and that those persons, so inoculated, were obliged to pass from their several lodgings and places of abode, two or three times a week, in order to be examined at the hospital, than which nothing could, in his mind, be more calculated to disseminate infection, and to spread the ravages of that dreadful and malignant disorder. He hoped, therefore, some legislative measure would soon be adopted on that subject. As to the motion now under the consideration of the committee, it had his hearty concurrence.
Mr. Hawkins Brownesaid, he believed his hon. friend was not correct in what he had stated as to the Small-pox Hospital. He was not prepared at the moment to Speak decisively on the subject, but he believed, though it had formerly been the practice of the Small-pox Hospital to inoculate out-door patients, they had not done so lately. He was one of the governors of that hospital, and he knew they were very favourable to the practice of vaccination. If, however, what had been stated by his hon. friend were true, it would certainly deserve the consideration of the house to put a stop to such injurious proceedings. He thought, however, there had not been sufficient notice taken of one point, viz. that this mode of inoculation Was not subject to infection, and that therefore it was not liable to the serious objections made against inoculation for the small-pox. When this Subject was formerly before the house, he had voted for the smaller sum; but he did not mean thereby to confine himself to it, in case the discovery should be found to be attended with those advantages which had since been found to result from it; and he had no doubt in his mind, but if the then chancellor of the exchequer (Mr. Pitt) were now alive, and in that high office, he would now vote for the additional sum, though he also had then opposed it. He could wish this motion to be amended by the insertion of the words, "that this mode of inoculation was not liable to infection."
Mr. Sturges Bournesaid, in answer to the last hon. gent. that he could assure the committee he was correct in what he had stated as to the Small-pox Hospital, which he shewed by a statement of their Own, by which it appeared they had inocu
1012
lated 2245 persons in a year. In having done this, he meant no imputation on them; on the contrary, he believed, as his hon friend who spoke last had very truly mentioned, that the governors and professors were favourable to vaccination, and he hoped they would themselves put an end to the practice of inoculating out-patients, and thereby prevent the necessity of any legislative measure as to them.
Mr. Morrissaid, the great merit of this discovery was, that it exterminated the disease, whereas all other modes of inoculation increased it, by being liable to infection, and it had been indisputably proved, that since inoculation there had been more deaths than before it. He thought the sum proposed was too small. Dr. Jenner had dedicated his whole time to it, and had he not succeeded, his name would have been a bye-word among the people, and among those of his own profession in particular. He thought that he deserved from the country which he had so much benefited, a sum of money that would enable him to live in a state of ease, affluence, and independence, for the remainder of his days. He should therefore propose, as an amendment, that instead of the words 10,000 l. those of 20,000 l. be inserted. He assured the house, that though he had spoken warmly on the subject, he was not at all acquainted with Dr. Jenner, nor any of his immediate connexions, but was actuated by a thorough conviction in his own mind that the doctor was fully entitled to this additional remuneration. The hon. and learned gent. concluded by moving his amendment.
Sir John Sebrightmost cordially seconded the motion.
Mr. Herbertspoke in favour of the amendment. He said, he thought, in such a case as this, the house should have regard to what had been done in former cases of original discoveries. In that of the discovery of the longitude, they had offered 20,000 l., and he was of opinion, that for a more extensive and more advantageous discovery, they should not think of voting a lesser sum.
Mr. Wilberforcesaid, he was one of those who, on a former occasion, had voted for the lesser sum, because he wished, as far as they were compatible, to act at the same time on the principles of liberality and economy. An hon. gent. had said, that this differed from all other discoveries, because it came out at once matured and ripe for practice; this he believed to be truly correct, for a medical friend of his

1013
had assured him, that he had received a particular account of this discovery from Dr. Jenner 10 years before he made it known to the public; which shewed that he had not suffered himself to be hurried on by any private advantage, but had wisely deferred bringing it forward till it was in a state which was susceptible of immediate and general practice. If he had brought it out for his own private advantage., he might unquestionably have made a fortune by it; but he was above such self-interested considerations, and, from the first publication of it, he was always desirous to instruct every practitioner how to proceed with the best prospect of success. Dr. Jenner himself had never experienced any failure in his practice, though others had; but that was not to be wondered at, when it was considered what vast numbers of apothecaries and other practitioners there were throughout the country, and how very different and unequal their abilities in the profession. Dr. Jenner had thrown the discovery at once before the public, which had rapidly been conveyed to all countries, and, from the simplicity and perspicuity of the process recommended by him, in the short space of ten years, it had been spread to all parts of the habitable globe. It had made its way, and was universally adopted in Turkey, in the East Indies, and the immensely extensive territories of China; in all which it had met with the most unexampled success, and had saved the lives of millions of people in those various populous countries. If Dr. Jenner had acted thus generously and thrown himself on the liberality of the public, he ought to be rewarded; and that such reward might be commensurate to his merit, he should be for the larger sum, and support the amendment; but, if it should meet the approbation of the committee, he owned he would rather prefer a farther amendment of his own, and propose, that an annuity of 1000 l. should be voted, in addition to the sum of 10,000 l. in the original motion of that evening. His reason for this was, that in consequence of this discovery having become so universally known and adopted, Dr. Jenner had become a person of great fame and character abroad. No man was so much or so speedily enquired for by foreigners, on their, arrival in this country; no man more sought alter, He was, of course, under the necessity of being accessible to them; and it was impos-
1014
sible to be so, without incurring considerable expence. This annuity, in addition to the sum originally moved for this evening, would enable him to enjoy, through life, his country's grateful sense of the benefits derived from his labours and his talents. He had, by dedicating so much of his time to divulging his discovery in the most extensive way, lost his practice at Gloucester and at Cheltenham; and he begged gentlemen to recollect, that when this subject was formerly before the house, it had been said that Dr. Jenner would be able to compensate himself by his practice; but the contrary had actually been the fact, and he had made the practice so universally and so clearly known, that he was frequently less consulted in town than many others. Dr. Jenner generally attended his (Mr. Wilberforce's) children; but on one or two occasions, when there was thought a necessity of applying for medical assistance, and Dr. Jenner was not immediately in the way, he had instantly sent to another person, without any apprehension of his not being completely acquainted with the whole system. Under these circumstances, he would vote for the larger sum, but should prefer his own plan of an annuity.
Mr. Windhamapproved highly of the system of vaccination. Although no country could give too much as a reward for such a benefit, yet there ought to be limits. In the present case, it was the misfortune of the inventor, that the extent and value of his discovery was so great, because the magnitude of that extent and value rendered it difficult to determine how much he merited. He should vote for the larger sum of 20,000 l. and principally from taking a view of the subject totally neglected by those who had spoken before him. These right hon. members had forgotten that the tendency of the vaccine inoculation was to exterminate the small-pox completely, and thus to free mankind from the most dreadful scourge inflicted by the hand of Heaven.
The Chancellor of the Exchequerthought it material to state, that an annuity could not be voted without the previous form of a committee of the whole house, or without a message from his majesty. Under every consideration of the subject, he thought the sum originally proposed was just what ought to be voted. He commended the care taken by the Speaker to disseminate the conviction of the established authenticity of this discovery, by causing an

1015
extraordinary number of copies of the report of the college of physicians to be printed, and to be judiciously distributed through the country. He again defended the originally proposed vote, as most reasonable and proper.
Mr. W. Smiththought, that in order to constitute the grant or reward, the expences Dr. Jenner had been at ought to be previously paid. Dr. Jenner could prove, that he had expended more than the original sum voted to him, in propagating the discovery, before the vote had passed. He cited from a Madrid gazette of October last, an account of the honours done to a medical person, sent to communicate the vaccine inoculation in all the foreign possessions of Spain, upon his return from his mission. He cited reports from various parts of the world, stating the success of vaccination, particularly in our Indian possessions. He trusted that under these circumstances, the larger reward would be voted.
Mr. Whitbreadmaintained the propriety of voting the larger sum. He was the more particularly interested in recommending this discovery to remuneration, as it had contributed infinitely to the relief of the poor, in whose cause he was now particularly engaged. If this opportunity of conferring an adequate reward should be passed by, it would never return.
Mr. Fulleralso supported the enlarged motion. He thought something ought to be done to prevent inoculation for the small-pox, otherwise the discovery would not have its full effect.
After a few words in support of the larger grant, from Mr. Baring, Mr. Rose jun. and sir C. Pole,
the house divided: For the larger grant 60; For the smaller 47; Majority 13.

POOR RELIEF BILL.
Mr. Whitbreadmoved the order of the day for going into a committee on the poor's Relief bill.— On the clause relating to Settlement, a conversation took place between Mr. Morris, Mr. Whitbread, Mr. Fuller, Mr. Calvert, Mr. Giddy, Mr. W. Smith, Mr. Pole Carew, Mr. Rose, Mr. S. Bourne, and the Solicitor-General.
Mr. S. Bourneproposed that the blank should be filled up with the words "ten years," instead Of "five."
Mr. Whitbreadwas willing to admit the introduction of "seven years."—A division ensued; for the ten years 32, against it 25: majority 7.
Mr. W. Smithmoved for the admission into the clause of a proviso that it should not extend to Norwich.
After some observation by Mr. Whitbread, this motion was negatived without a division.—A long discussion then took place on the question, "that the above clause so amended, stand part of the bill;" which terminated in a division: For the clause 23; against it 30; majority 7.
Mr. Whitbreadthen declared his intention of abandoning the bill for the present session, and the chairman left the chair.