HC Deb 20 February 1990 vol 167 cc637-8W
Ms. Armstrong

To ask the Secretary of State for Education and Science how many objections were submitted to him in respect of each of the grant-maintained proposals that have subsequently been(a) approved and (b) rejected; and in each case how many people in total were signatories to such objections.

Mr. Alan Howarth

[holding answer 19 February 1990]: The number of statutory objections received in respect of proposals for each of the grant-maintained proposals that were subsequently (a) approved and (b) rejected is as follows:

Number of statutory objections
Approved
Audenshaw County High, Tameside 21
Bacup and Rawtenstall, Lancashire 4
Bankfield County High, Cheshire 1
Baverstock School, Birmingham 3
Beechen Clifl", Avon 38

Number of statutory objections
Bishopshalt, Hillingdon 15
Cardinal Vaughan Memorial, ILEA 11
Castle Hall Middle, Kirklees 9
Claremont High, Brent 2
Colyton Grammar, Devon 2
Guildford County, Surrey 2
Heckmondwike Grammar, Kirklees 5
Hendon School Barnet 6
Kings School, Lincolnshire 0
Lancaster Royal Grammar School, Lancashire 1
London Nautical School, ILEA 6
London Oratory School, ILEA 0
Long Field High, Leicestershire 22
Marling, Gloucestershire 0
Netherthorpe School, Derbyshire 14
Old Swinford Hospital, Dudley 0
Queen Elizabeth Grammar, Lincolnshire 6
Queen Elizabeth's Boys, Barnet 4
Queensbury School, Bedfordshire 7
Ribston Hall High, Gloucestershire 22
St. Francis Xavier's, Liverpool 3
St. James' CE, Bolton 30
Skegness Grammar, Lincolnshire 1
Small Heath School, Birmingham 1
Southfield School, Northamptonshire 8
Southlands, Berkshire 4
Stroud Girls' High, Gloucestershire 0
Watford Boys Grammar, Hertfordshire 5
Wilmington Grammar, Kent 2
Wilson's School, Sutton 6
Rejected
Blessed Hugh Moor RC, Lincolnshire 1
Castlemount High, Kent 1
Hindley Park, Wigan 0
Kettering Boys, Northamptonshire 5
Longlands, Dudley 1
Ramsden School for Girls, Bromley 12
Simon Digby, Solihull 1
Sir James Altham, Hertfordshire 2
South Park High, Lincolnshire 1

The total number of signatories in each case could not be established without disproportionate expense.

Forward to