HL Deb 06 March 1843 vol 67 cc288-90
Lord Brougham

said, that in the event of his noble and learned Friend on the Woolsack, or his noble and learned Friend, the Lord Chief Justice of the Queen's Bench, not agreeing that it was necessary to bring in a measure, or to make any proposal relative to the state of the law relating to the crimes of persons alleged to be labouring under partial insanity, he should feel it his bounden duty to call the attention of their Lordships to the subject. He would do so with the more reluctance, because any such proposition would come with much better grace from either of his noble and learned Friends. It was only the present emergency of the case which induced him to take it up. But if either of the noble and learned Lords would take the matter in hand, he would be most deeply anxious to render them the best assistance in his power.

The Lord Chancellor

said, he was happy his noble and learned Friend had mentioned the subject. He (the Lord Chancellor) had already turned his attention to it with a view of discovering if anything could be done to remedy the evil. He was about to enter into communication with those persons who were most likely to afford correct information upon the subject. Whether the course he had commenced would be productive of any practical effect or not, he could not then say, but he would take an early opportunity of again adverting to the subject. Meanwhile, he should be happy to co-operate with his noble and learned Friend.

Lord Brougham

said, that nothing could be more satisfactory to the country than the statement just made by his noble and learned Friend. He should be most happy to communicate with him at all times, which might best suit his convenience and that of his Colleagues. There were, perhaps, reasons why his noble and learned Friend, the Lord Chief Justice, from his high position in the administration of the criminal law, should undertake the subject.

The Lord Chancellor

said, had he been aware, that the noble and learned Lord intended taking up the question, he would have communicated to him the course Government intended to pursue.

Lord Denman

said, he had not at all turned his mind to the consideration of this subject, but certainly he had formed an opinion, arising out of late events, that it would be highly proper the matter should be made the subject of a most careful consideration. The more he re- flected on the question, the more he was of opinion that it was highly proper such a measure should be brought forward by her Majesty's Government. He need not say on the part of himself and the rest of her Majesty's judges, if her Majesty's Government thought their counsel or testimony could in any degree be useful in framing the measure, they should be happy to afford it. For himself, he should esteem it a most important duty to give every advice or assistance in his power.

Lord Campbell

said, they could all have but one common object in furthering such a law, and he rejoiced, that the consideration of her Majesty's Government was about to be given to it. He should not have said a single word on the present occasion, if he had not apprehended some misunderstanding might arise from what had fallen from his noble and learned Friend behind him (Lord Brougham). His noble Friend had used the words partial insanity, and it might be thought, that persons labouring under partial insanity, were relieved from all responsibility. That, he apprehended, was not the law. Unless it were proved that insanity existed at the time the act was committed, and that such insanity might be duly considered the immediate cause of the criminal act, there was at present no immunity from conviction and punishment. He hoped it would be considered by the noble Lord on the Woolsack, whether some measure might not be taken for apprehending and putting into safe custody those labouring under this dangerous state of mind. There might be great difficulty in convicting persons who were not in a state of mind to be responsible for their actions; but it was monstrous to think that society should be exposed to the dreadful dangers to which it was at present subjected, from persons in that state of mind going at large.

Lord Brougham

explained, that what he meant by "partial insanity" was more properly expressed by the word "mono mania." Monomania did not mean that partial insanity which went and returned at various times, but the mind was at all periods under its influence. He had merely desired to distinguish the state of mind he meant to describe from total and absolute deprivation of reason.

Subject at an end.

Back to
Forward to