HL Deb 10 March 1840 vol 52 cc1109-12
The Marquess of Lansdowne

rose to call the attention of their Lordships to a petition of an unusual nature, from a body of persona who did not frequently appear as petitioners; the petitioners were a very large number of the medical profession, who were desirous of calling their Lordships' attention to a subject, not only interesting in every view of public utility and expediency, but also interesting to many of their Lordships in their private capacity, and as it affected their domestic feelings. It related to the present state of vaccination in this country, and though signed by only a few persons bearing office in the Medical Society of London, it expressed the opinion of not less than 1,200 medical practitioners, who were desirous of calling attention to the fact, that the small-pox, so far from having diminished of late years, had been on the increase; and were also desirous of stating to their Lordships the opinion which, after much deliberation, they had formed on the subject, that the increase was owing, on the one hand, to the imperfect state of vaccination in many parts of the country; and, secondly, that it had spread and increased through the perseverance of persons, not connected with the medical profession, and not entitled to act in a medical capacity, in the practice of inoculation. The petitioners also stated, as an important fact connected with the subject, that there was a perfect identity between vaccination and the small pox, although the symptoms were different; and this (as we understood) had been proved by the inoculation of a cow with various matter, and the result was all the appearance of the disease that resulted from vaccination. It had been made a subject of complaint, that although a person had been vaccinated, yet, after the lapse of several years, there might be an attack of small pox; but this was not the case, in nearly the same proportion there was not a second attack of small pox after inoculation. It was also undoubtedly true, that very few deaths resulted from small-pox, which was taken subsequent to vaccination, for the disease always then appeared in a very mitigated form. The petitioners, however, submit, that no conclusion can be drawn against the theory of vaccination, but they state, that the imperfect means of vaccinating adopted in this country, through the licence given to persons who are not capable of forming an opinion on the subject, has been attended with many increasing evils; and in those particular places in which no vaccination had been adopted, there had been thousands of deaths in the course of a few years; and there was one city in the south of England where no less than five hundred persons had died of the small-pox in one year. The petitioners did not wish that this evil should be remedied by having recourse to those rigorous measures or despotic proceedings, which had been had recourse to in some countries in Europe—namely, a positive prohibition to inoculate with variola matter, and that some penalties should be imposed on those who did not take care that their children were regularly vaccinated. They suggested, that the House should consider how far it would be proper to prohibit persons from inoculating for the small-pox, such persons not being members of the medical profession, and, therefore, not influenced by those considerations which impelled the latter to abstain from doing so. They also recommended, that a great number of persons should be employed in vaccinating the poor of the country. He need not tell their Lordships that it was the duty of the higher classes of society to discountenance any practice which might be found to be annually productive of a great amount of misery and disease, and this could effectually be done by promoting this easy and simple remedy, which was calculated to mitigate and remove one of the greatest pests that ever inflicted humanity.

Lord Ellenborough

agreed with the noble Marquess, but suggested, that a short bill should be brought in, to enable poor-law guardians to make contracts for the vaccination of the poor. It was entirely a question of expense. Some medical gentleman vaccinated gratis for the poor; others, however, did not, and their charges were higher than those of the quacks who inoculated for the small-pox.

Lord Colchester

observed, that he could testify that the poorer classes were not averse to vaccination, but the truth was, that they had not the means of getting it. In one district in Sussex, the board of guardians had provided the means of vaccination, and there had been no smallpox there at all.

The Marquess of Normanby

considered the subject so important, that he would cause every inquiry to be made, whether the evil would not be remedied by the measure suggested by the noble Baron opposite, and thus the good practice encouraged and the bad discouraged.

Petition read and laid on the Table.